Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scribe" data-source="post: 8931946" data-attributes="member: 6807152">I think we misunderstand each other at a fundamental level.(I'm not saying you are in favour of PF1, its my system of choice.)I'm not suggesting we support Wizards, I'm not wanting to solve the problem of 5e being too dominant. The point of the thread and the open question(s) are I guess1. Can it even be solved.2. If not, how can it (5e dominance) be leveraged for good?I'm not trying to limit discussion. If your answer to the premise of the thread is 'D&D is out there, and folk D&D is the answer' in the form of whatever version you like, thats a perfectly valid answer. Does it look like DCC? Maybe? I love the flavour of the free rules.The issue is one of 3PP keeping the lights on, as you noted, and how that is done, within the realm of 5e being the overwhelmingly dominant space.See, I've tried, and also had others try and get me to pick up other systems (Table Top games mostly), to varying levels of failure. The issue has always boiled down to "my time is limited, why play X, when I could play Y, and if I only have time for Y, I'm certainly not going to invest into learning X at all".Just my experience though. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>