Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tsyr" data-source="post: 384174" data-attributes="member: 354">WotC's sales would have probably been less, frankly. See my next point.&nbsp;Probably as many will stay as will not, just like the original. The &quot;rest of us&quot; were new at one time too. And that number probably just about makes up for the people who abandoned DnD back before 3E for various reasons, the system being one of them. 3E brought back a lot of those people. Had 3E been hackmaster, those people wouldn't have come back.I love Hackmaster. But lets be honest. It's 1E/2E, with most of the problems that go along with it. At it's core, it's a 20 year old game, one of the first to come out, before millions of ideas were out there to pick and choose from. And it does show. For those of who still like 1E/2E, It's a great game. For those people who DIDN'T, Hackmaster would be no more attractive than the 2E was. 3E, on the other hand...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tsyr, post: 384174, member: 354"] WotC's sales would have probably been less, frankly. See my next point. Probably as many will stay as will not, just like the original. The "rest of us" were new at one time too. And that number probably just about makes up for the people who abandoned DnD back before 3E for various reasons, the system being one of them. 3E brought back a lot of those people. Had 3E been hackmaster, those people wouldn't have come back. I love Hackmaster. But lets be honest. It's 1E/2E, with most of the problems that go along with it. At it's core, it's a 20 year old game, one of the first to come out, before millions of ideas were out there to pick and choose from. And it does show. For those of who still like 1E/2E, It's a great game. For those people who DIDN'T, Hackmaster would be no more attractive than the 2E was. 3E, on the other hand... [/QUOTE]

Verification