Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What is positive?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 8846888" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>It's hard to say. </p><p></p><p>There are things that were solidly nixed on the original playtest that the creators of the game feel SO STRONGLY NEED TO BE INCLUDED that they have basically reintroduced those ideas over the past 3 years. </p><p></p><p>They REALLY WANT those ideas in the next iteration.</p><p></p><p>Period.</p><p></p><p>Dot.</p><p></p><p>I would not be surprised if it means they are twisting data or creating questions that will be psychologically favoring what they want to have it answered as.</p><p></p><p>They said they had 40K+ respondents. That would be 2 million dollars of sales for their next PHB on that basis.</p><p></p><p>I know I've checked out for the most part. I see a lot of stuff being introduced that I really don't care for. It's not that I already have 2-3 copies of 5e and most of the books already (I'd still have normally gotten the next ones if I didn't check out) that will cause me not to buy the next ones.</p><p></p><p>It's from the plain fact that I feel that they are going to do whatever they feel they WANT to do regardless of any input they get. If that means they have to twist questions to get the answers they want...they'll do it. If they have to twist the data to get what they want...they'll do that.</p><p></p><p>In the long run, I'm inconsequential. I've already checked out in that way. The differences are going to be too vast and they are changing what I think I like and keeping some things I don't. I could be the only one that feels that way. I don't think my voice would be heeded, even if I answered the surveys...so I haven't.</p><p></p><p>If there are more like me...well...40K+ is still a LOT of people responding.</p><p></p><p>If they are on the right track, 1D&D will sell like hotcakes. If they aren't...well...the numbers will speak for themselves when it comes out. </p><p></p><p>In the long run, does it even really matter anymore. For those who like what they see being published (and that is 80% according to what they said) than...more power for them. Good for them and hope they sell out like never before. The more people buying the better overall for me in that way.</p><p></p><p>If they don't sell all that great, well, hopefully they learn the lesson before it gets too late. Perhaps they'll actually try to figure out what turned off people like me. I doubt it with the current mindset, but you could always hope. Eventually though, they'll still publish D&D in some form, even if it means they have to go back to the drawing board. </p><p></p><p>I expect that they have some iota of what they are doing though and it will either sell really well and bring in more money than 5e did when it was first released, or at least sell decently enough to justify them to keep going.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 8846888, member: 4348"] It's hard to say. There are things that were solidly nixed on the original playtest that the creators of the game feel SO STRONGLY NEED TO BE INCLUDED that they have basically reintroduced those ideas over the past 3 years. They REALLY WANT those ideas in the next iteration. Period. Dot. I would not be surprised if it means they are twisting data or creating questions that will be psychologically favoring what they want to have it answered as. They said they had 40K+ respondents. That would be 2 million dollars of sales for their next PHB on that basis. I know I've checked out for the most part. I see a lot of stuff being introduced that I really don't care for. It's not that I already have 2-3 copies of 5e and most of the books already (I'd still have normally gotten the next ones if I didn't check out) that will cause me not to buy the next ones. It's from the plain fact that I feel that they are going to do whatever they feel they WANT to do regardless of any input they get. If that means they have to twist questions to get the answers they want...they'll do it. If they have to twist the data to get what they want...they'll do that. In the long run, I'm inconsequential. I've already checked out in that way. The differences are going to be too vast and they are changing what I think I like and keeping some things I don't. I could be the only one that feels that way. I don't think my voice would be heeded, even if I answered the surveys...so I haven't. If there are more like me...well...40K+ is still a LOT of people responding. If they are on the right track, 1D&D will sell like hotcakes. If they aren't...well...the numbers will speak for themselves when it comes out. In the long run, does it even really matter anymore. For those who like what they see being published (and that is 80% according to what they said) than...more power for them. Good for them and hope they sell out like never before. The more people buying the better overall for me in that way. If they don't sell all that great, well, hopefully they learn the lesson before it gets too late. Perhaps they'll actually try to figure out what turned off people like me. I doubt it with the current mindset, but you could always hope. Eventually though, they'll still publish D&D in some form, even if it means they have to go back to the drawing board. I expect that they have some iota of what they are doing though and it will either sell really well and bring in more money than 5e did when it was first released, or at least sell decently enough to justify them to keep going. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What is positive?
Top