Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
What is Powerful Build worth?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnSnow" data-source="post: 3424525" data-attributes="member: 32164"><p>So, as small creatures with mighty build, dwarves would end up having the following stats:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">20-foot rate of movement</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">treated as medium creatures for grappling purposes</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">treated as medium creatures for purposes of encumbrance and load</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the ability to use medium weapons without penalty</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">+1 size benefit to AC </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">+1 size benefit to attacks</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">+4 size benefit to hide checks</li> </ul><p></p><p>As small creatures, their movement rate is 20 feet (as now). They'd be able to wield medium weapons with penalty (as they do now). They'd be treated as medium for purposes of bull rushes, grapples, and load (as they are now). So essentially, the only benefit they get out of it is to replace their racial bonus to attacks against orcs and goblins with a simple static bonus based on them being small. </p><p></p><p>So it makes sense to me. Quite honestly, with a little tweaking, you might be able to make dwarves MORE balanced. They could, of course, also be shorter (3'6" or thereabouts) rather than arbitrarily shoved to a 4' minimum by their size category. For instance, make them size small with powerful build, give them a DEX penalty to offset their CON bonus (AC penalty offset by size bonus), and a higher benefit to the appropriate craft checks (+4 rather than +2). You'd have to make your own call on their ability to move in Medium or Heavy armor without penalty or their extra benefit against being bull-rushed tripped. Personally, I think you could leave those abilities in place.</p><p></p><p>You could leave everything else intact. And you'd have dwarves that made sense. They'd be less likely to use missile weapons due to their dex penalty. But their small size would prevent it from hurting them too much in combat against most of their traditional foes. Except against goblins, which might explain why dwarves loathe them.</p><p></p><p>It also is more in keeping with the fantasy traditions for dwarves to be small.</p><p></p><p>My two cents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnSnow, post: 3424525, member: 32164"] So, as small creatures with mighty build, dwarves would end up having the following stats: [list] [*]20-foot rate of movement [*]treated as medium creatures for grappling purposes [*]treated as medium creatures for purposes of encumbrance and load [*]the ability to use medium weapons without penalty [*]+1 size benefit to AC [*]+1 size benefit to attacks [*]+4 size benefit to hide checks[/list] As small creatures, their movement rate is 20 feet (as now). They'd be able to wield medium weapons with penalty (as they do now). They'd be treated as medium for purposes of bull rushes, grapples, and load (as they are now). So essentially, the only benefit they get out of it is to replace their racial bonus to attacks against orcs and goblins with a simple static bonus based on them being small. So it makes sense to me. Quite honestly, with a little tweaking, you might be able to make dwarves MORE balanced. They could, of course, also be shorter (3'6" or thereabouts) rather than arbitrarily shoved to a 4' minimum by their size category. For instance, make them size small with powerful build, give them a DEX penalty to offset their CON bonus (AC penalty offset by size bonus), and a higher benefit to the appropriate craft checks (+4 rather than +2). You'd have to make your own call on their ability to move in Medium or Heavy armor without penalty or their extra benefit against being bull-rushed tripped. Personally, I think you could leave those abilities in place. You could leave everything else intact. And you'd have dwarves that made sense. They'd be less likely to use missile weapons due to their dex penalty. But their small size would prevent it from hurting them too much in combat against most of their traditional foes. Except against goblins, which might explain why dwarves loathe them. It also is more in keeping with the fantasy traditions for dwarves to be small. My two cents. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
What is Powerful Build worth?
Top