Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What is the best way to create effective Monk only with core rules?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Corwin" data-source="post: 241241" data-attributes="member: 1560"><p>First I'd like to adress the fact that I'm sorry you felt the need to put me on your Ignore List. (Not that you will be able to read this response.)</p><p></p><p>Speaking of which, I don't even understand why people use the Ignore List feature so readily. I guess, if you were being cyber-stalked, or something, I could see why. But this is the first time we have ever had any problem with each other (or even communicated, AFAIK).</p><p></p><p>But to just toss people on there that you disagree with seems kinda like running away to me. Of course, that's just IMO. To each his/her/its own</p><p> </p><p>Anyway... (in case you end up reading this after all, I'd like to continue to respond to your statements). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You never stated (in your first post) that WotC had officially ruled on something "similar" to the topic at hand. Please, go back and re-read your statement. You matter-of-factly stated that WotC had ruled that natural weapons increased monk damage. You used pretty plain English. The sentance with "pretty much" directs the reader to understand that the ruling you claim WotC had made was "similar" to gamecat's houserule (implying that his way of doing things is pretty much the way WotC says it should be). Again, this is far different than stating that being bigger was somehow related to having claws in some way. Still not a true statement.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Let's get something straight. My first response to you was far from "out for blood". You can claim victim all you like, but it's quite plain what happened. You made a false statement. That statement was designed to back up a houserule as "official". You made no effort to support your claim. I happened to know it was untrue. I called you out on it.</p><p></p><p>What happened next? You took offense to being asked to support your false claim and fired off a snide, sarcastic little retort showing further that you had no grasp of the rules at hand.</p><p></p><p>If anyone here is at fault for this little conflict, it is you. I don't claim to be innocent here, mind you. I willingly joined you on your level. But please point the finger where it belongs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't even know what Team Fortress is. None of this is relavant, anyway. I could just as easy state that it is quite odd that the only other Jeremy I know is a <em>nice</em> guy. What a contrast there is between the two of <em>you</em>. See, still no relavance.</p><p></p><p>Ignore me all you like, just don't do it while claiming to take the high road. Hypocrisy doesn't sit well with me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Corwin, post: 241241, member: 1560"] First I'd like to adress the fact that I'm sorry you felt the need to put me on your Ignore List. (Not that you will be able to read this response.) Speaking of which, I don't even understand why people use the Ignore List feature so readily. I guess, if you were being cyber-stalked, or something, I could see why. But this is the first time we have ever had any problem with each other (or even communicated, AFAIK). But to just toss people on there that you disagree with seems kinda like running away to me. Of course, that's just IMO. To each his/her/its own Anyway... (in case you end up reading this after all, I'd like to continue to respond to your statements). You never stated (in your first post) that WotC had officially ruled on something "similar" to the topic at hand. Please, go back and re-read your statement. You matter-of-factly stated that WotC had ruled that natural weapons increased monk damage. You used pretty plain English. The sentance with "pretty much" directs the reader to understand that the ruling you claim WotC had made was "similar" to gamecat's houserule (implying that his way of doing things is pretty much the way WotC says it should be). Again, this is far different than stating that being bigger was somehow related to having claws in some way. Still not a true statement. Let's get something straight. My first response to you was far from "out for blood". You can claim victim all you like, but it's quite plain what happened. You made a false statement. That statement was designed to back up a houserule as "official". You made no effort to support your claim. I happened to know it was untrue. I called you out on it. What happened next? You took offense to being asked to support your false claim and fired off a snide, sarcastic little retort showing further that you had no grasp of the rules at hand. If anyone here is at fault for this little conflict, it is you. I don't claim to be innocent here, mind you. I willingly joined you on your level. But please point the finger where it belongs. I don't even know what Team Fortress is. None of this is relavant, anyway. I could just as easy state that it is quite odd that the only other Jeremy I know is a [i]nice[/i] guy. What a contrast there is between the two of [i]you[/i]. See, still no relavance. Ignore me all you like, just don't do it while claiming to take the high road. Hypocrisy doesn't sit well with me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What is the best way to create effective Monk only with core rules?
Top