Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What "IS" the Dungeons & Dragons Brand?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="howandwhy99" data-source="post: 3751418" data-attributes="member: 3192"><p>It's the system, though it has been misinterpreted as the setting.</p><p></p><p>Think of Monte Cooke's new World of Darkness D20 game. Are you playing the World of Darkness or d20? Both, right? The catch is, the game is not the same as it was under White Wolf. The System makes the Setting a different experience. The same setting could be placed under GURPS, Unisystem, even FATE's Spirit of the Century (which embodies the D&D experience quite well), and each time it would feel different. Various play styles would be helped and hindered by each.</p><p></p><p>D&D may have become considered a de facto setting, while the inherent setting is actually no campaign world at all (not even Greyhawk). It is a toolkit, play box, idea engine, not meant to be sensical to itself, everything and the kitchen sink Setting Resource. The rules made it what it was and the groups made the setting from the pieces they liked. </p><p></p><p>Even the system itself wasn't immune to change. It had dozens of house rules and alterations at practically every table. It may not have been designed to be tinkered with, but that element is part of what made it such a great game. DMs and Players felt they were competent enough to design rules without being professionals. It helped that the core rules didn't break the first time you tried to tinker with them either.</p><p></p><p>And you needed to make rules. In no way can the rules cover every eventuality. Imagination demands freshness. It dies in stale traditions. No amount of monsters, spells, or magic items can satisfy an imaginative mind from desiring that cool new idea. There's no rule for speeding up biodegradation? Possessing another's eyes? Breaking another's sword with your hum? So what? Make it up. Make it exactly what you want it to be. The rule execution, the parameters, the feel, the description. Whatever matters to you. </p><p></p><p>I'm not sure what is and isn't D&D anymore. But I do know, ever since Advanced D&D started, 1-4, every one of them looks like mandatory house rules have been added without thought of how easily they could be removed, altered, represented, tinkered with, polished up, ... etc. </p><p></p><p>Of course, that's the nature of complex systems. But I don't believe the D&D system requires complexity to play. That's for everyone else to decide.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="howandwhy99, post: 3751418, member: 3192"] It's the system, though it has been misinterpreted as the setting. Think of Monte Cooke's new World of Darkness D20 game. Are you playing the World of Darkness or d20? Both, right? The catch is, the game is not the same as it was under White Wolf. The System makes the Setting a different experience. The same setting could be placed under GURPS, Unisystem, even FATE's Spirit of the Century (which embodies the D&D experience quite well), and each time it would feel different. Various play styles would be helped and hindered by each. D&D may have become considered a de facto setting, while the inherent setting is actually no campaign world at all (not even Greyhawk). It is a toolkit, play box, idea engine, not meant to be sensical to itself, everything and the kitchen sink Setting Resource. The rules made it what it was and the groups made the setting from the pieces they liked. Even the system itself wasn't immune to change. It had dozens of house rules and alterations at practically every table. It may not have been designed to be tinkered with, but that element is part of what made it such a great game. DMs and Players felt they were competent enough to design rules without being professionals. It helped that the core rules didn't break the first time you tried to tinker with them either. And you needed to make rules. In no way can the rules cover every eventuality. Imagination demands freshness. It dies in stale traditions. No amount of monsters, spells, or magic items can satisfy an imaginative mind from desiring that cool new idea. There's no rule for speeding up biodegradation? Possessing another's eyes? Breaking another's sword with your hum? So what? Make it up. Make it exactly what you want it to be. The rule execution, the parameters, the feel, the description. Whatever matters to you. I'm not sure what is and isn't D&D anymore. But I do know, ever since Advanced D&D started, 1-4, every one of them looks like mandatory house rules have been added without thought of how easily they could be removed, altered, represented, tinkered with, polished up, ... etc. Of course, that's the nature of complex systems. But I don't believe the D&D system requires complexity to play. That's for everyone else to decide. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What "IS" the Dungeons & Dragons Brand?
Top