Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What is the essence of D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Monayuris" data-source="post: 7828708" data-attributes="member: 6859536"><p>You presented a lot to unpack. So I'll take them in order. I apologize for the LONG post.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There are very few situations where a spell caster in B/X can blink the party home in an instant. You are thinking spells like teleport (which are both high level and also somewhat risky… it is possible to fail a teleport and end up lost miles from where you intended to go).</p><p></p><p>The closest spell I can think of that is accessible at low levels and acts as a win button would be Sleep. It is true; this spell can negate an entire encounter. But there are significant trade offs…</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">A MU (Magic User) is likely only going to have one casting of the spell. A 2nd level MU could have 2, but they would have to memorize 2 copies of the spell and forgo the use of other potentially useful spells. MU's get very limited spells per day.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Sleep is only effective on weaker creatures, at the point where a MU is powerful enough to afford multiple castings of the spell the threats they will face will likely be immune.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Casting spells needs to be declared before initiative. If the MU loses initiative and takes damage, the spell fails and is lost. The act of casting in combat is inherently risky.</li> </ol><p></p><p>All of these things put the MU on par balance wise with the rest of the party. The MU can negate an encounter, once. They get the spotlight in this case, but once that is done, they are relegated to supporting roles in future encounters.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not quite sure what you mean by playing the DM. Are you talking about trying to manipulate or trick the DM?</p><p></p><p>There are many clear elements in B/X where player skill at the game directly impacts the success of the session that don't require manipulation.</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Time management. Making skilled choices in deciding actions in the dungeon weighed against time it takes. Making good judgment on whether an activity should be attempted… weighing against risks such as depletion of light sources and wandering monsters.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Encounter management. Choosing when to engage in combat and when to evade or attempt talking. Making judgments on the value of sacrificing treasure or food to avoid an unwanted encounter.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Spell management. Making judgements on the best time to utilize limited resources like spells or wands.</li> </ol><p>These three items alone provide systematic game play that requires player skill and the skill of the player in this directly effects whether they are successful. There is zero playing the DM involved here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>None of these are necessary. Your character is your avatar / playing piece in the game, not you, yourself. Player skill has nothing to do with this. The skill comes from making the choices as a player to use the abilities of your character. If this sounds very similar to the approach that 4E takes, it is because it is similar. Its just the mechanism is different.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No of course not. But if their character is a fighter and/or came from nautical background then its likely they'll have the skills to make it to the shore. Instead of a laundry list of skills or a massive suite of powers, I can work with the player to reach a reasonable judgement about the capabilities of a character.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree that players are indeed dependent on the DM. I disagree on the approach to solution.</p><p></p><p>D&D is a game. Like any other game worth playing, it requires a certain amount of skill… both as a player and as a DM. People can be bad at D&D, they can lack skill. But like any other game, the more effort you put into the game the more skill you develop. At least for me, a significant part of any game is not just the experience of playing the game but the accomplishment of becoming better at it.</p><p></p><p>For me personally, instead of striving to reduce the influence of the DM, effort should be put into helping DM's improve their skill.</p><p></p><p>To be frank, if a DM is forcing you to guess at what they see as important, then they are not a skilled DM.</p><p></p><p>They should be providing clear choices and they should be clear about the consequences of your choices. A skilled DM will ask the player what their intention is and explain the risks and consequences in a manner that allow the player to make an informed choice.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not trying to make claims that I am better at anyone else.</p><p></p><p>To be honest the statements you make about the 'door situation' are just as perplexing and off base as statements about 4E being 'just a video game'. </p><p></p><p>No one who wants to run an old school game in good conscious and with honesty does that.</p><p></p><p>You are describing poor DM'ing or flat out a**hole behavior. It's not a game system problem. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not sure I understand this comment. I would welcome clarification if you would be interested.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I am familiar with skill challenges. I've run 4E for over 5 years… so I understand the mechanic. I understand the primary vs. secondary skill and the complexity ratings.</p><p></p><p>I was never able to run skill challenge as its own encounter in a satisfying way.</p><p></p><p>I got better use out of them as a part of an encounter. For example: the party has to complete a skill challenge to deactivate an eldritch machine while its guardians attack them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure. You are talking about reward systems here and campaign tone.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I am a fan of XP for gold (as presented in B/X). I see XP for gold as an objective advancement tied to challenging the players. The choices and actions taken by the players result in the acquisition of treasure. Good choices lead to more treasure, poor choices don't.</p><p></p><p>But there some middle ground here. Players are not purely rational actors.</p><p></p><p>Just because you get experience for gold, doesn't mean that players will rob every living thing they come across and not save barmaids. In my experience running B/X for a decade, the game doesn't really turn everyone into murderous larcenous psychopaths.</p><p></p><p>Of course it does create a more cavalier approach to heroism. Characters aren't heroes they are adventurers.</p><p></p><p>If you want a campaign of heroes you don't use XP for gold.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The game I am most familiar with is B/X.</p><p></p><p>I enjoy the procedural elements of the game, but I preface this in that they tend to be better suited to a dungeon delve / adventuring tone as opposed to a heroic tone.</p><p></p><p>But what I am talking about is the interactions between Turn based dungeon / wilderness exploration, wandering monsters, random reaction rolls, light source depletion over time. There is a lot of interesting game developments that happen just with the random procedural engine.</p><p></p><p>Some, examples…</p><p></p><p>Rolling an orc encounter with a friendly reaction result. Why are they friendly? Maybe they are being hunted by some even more powerful creature… maybe they will negotiate for help from the party.</p><p></p><p>Rolling a brigand encounter with No. Appearing 1. Why is one lone brigand wandering the dungeon? Perhaps he was the last survivor of his adventuring party. Perhaps he's wounded. Will the party help him? What can they learn from him?</p><p></p><p>A stuck door that is not able to be forced open. Does the party hack it open with axes? It will take time and the noise will call for possible encounters. Should they continue to explore, intead, and maybe find a way around it?</p><p></p><p>These are all examples of encounters that happen that are besides the set piece room encounters. Events that require some improvisation and willingness to let the session go in unexpected directions. To me they are like improvisational prompts that challenge me as a DM to read the 'tea leaves' and piece together something from some random events.</p><p></p><p>The game isn't fully known even to me. As a DM, I am playing along with the players and discovering the world with them. Sometimes a random encounter and the procedural element shapes the entire evening of play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Monayuris, post: 7828708, member: 6859536"] You presented a lot to unpack. So I'll take them in order. I apologize for the LONG post. There are very few situations where a spell caster in B/X can blink the party home in an instant. You are thinking spells like teleport (which are both high level and also somewhat risky… it is possible to fail a teleport and end up lost miles from where you intended to go). The closest spell I can think of that is accessible at low levels and acts as a win button would be Sleep. It is true; this spell can negate an entire encounter. But there are significant trade offs… [LIST=1] [*]A MU (Magic User) is likely only going to have one casting of the spell. A 2nd level MU could have 2, but they would have to memorize 2 copies of the spell and forgo the use of other potentially useful spells. MU's get very limited spells per day. [*]Sleep is only effective on weaker creatures, at the point where a MU is powerful enough to afford multiple castings of the spell the threats they will face will likely be immune. [*]Casting spells needs to be declared before initiative. If the MU loses initiative and takes damage, the spell fails and is lost. The act of casting in combat is inherently risky. [/LIST] All of these things put the MU on par balance wise with the rest of the party. The MU can negate an encounter, once. They get the spotlight in this case, but once that is done, they are relegated to supporting roles in future encounters. I'm not quite sure what you mean by playing the DM. Are you talking about trying to manipulate or trick the DM? There are many clear elements in B/X where player skill at the game directly impacts the success of the session that don't require manipulation. [LIST=1] [*]Time management. Making skilled choices in deciding actions in the dungeon weighed against time it takes. Making good judgment on whether an activity should be attempted… weighing against risks such as depletion of light sources and wandering monsters. [*]Encounter management. Choosing when to engage in combat and when to evade or attempt talking. Making judgments on the value of sacrificing treasure or food to avoid an unwanted encounter. [*]Spell management. Making judgements on the best time to utilize limited resources like spells or wands. [/LIST] These three items alone provide systematic game play that requires player skill and the skill of the player in this directly effects whether they are successful. There is zero playing the DM involved here. None of these are necessary. Your character is your avatar / playing piece in the game, not you, yourself. Player skill has nothing to do with this. The skill comes from making the choices as a player to use the abilities of your character. If this sounds very similar to the approach that 4E takes, it is because it is similar. Its just the mechanism is different. No of course not. But if their character is a fighter and/or came from nautical background then its likely they'll have the skills to make it to the shore. Instead of a laundry list of skills or a massive suite of powers, I can work with the player to reach a reasonable judgement about the capabilities of a character. I agree that players are indeed dependent on the DM. I disagree on the approach to solution. D&D is a game. Like any other game worth playing, it requires a certain amount of skill… both as a player and as a DM. People can be bad at D&D, they can lack skill. But like any other game, the more effort you put into the game the more skill you develop. At least for me, a significant part of any game is not just the experience of playing the game but the accomplishment of becoming better at it. For me personally, instead of striving to reduce the influence of the DM, effort should be put into helping DM's improve their skill. To be frank, if a DM is forcing you to guess at what they see as important, then they are not a skilled DM. They should be providing clear choices and they should be clear about the consequences of your choices. A skilled DM will ask the player what their intention is and explain the risks and consequences in a manner that allow the player to make an informed choice. I'm not trying to make claims that I am better at anyone else. To be honest the statements you make about the 'door situation' are just as perplexing and off base as statements about 4E being 'just a video game'. No one who wants to run an old school game in good conscious and with honesty does that. You are describing poor DM'ing or flat out a**hole behavior. It's not a game system problem. I'm not sure I understand this comment. I would welcome clarification if you would be interested. I am familiar with skill challenges. I've run 4E for over 5 years… so I understand the mechanic. I understand the primary vs. secondary skill and the complexity ratings. I was never able to run skill challenge as its own encounter in a satisfying way. I got better use out of them as a part of an encounter. For example: the party has to complete a skill challenge to deactivate an eldritch machine while its guardians attack them. Sure. You are talking about reward systems here and campaign tone. Personally, I am a fan of XP for gold (as presented in B/X). I see XP for gold as an objective advancement tied to challenging the players. The choices and actions taken by the players result in the acquisition of treasure. Good choices lead to more treasure, poor choices don't. But there some middle ground here. Players are not purely rational actors. Just because you get experience for gold, doesn't mean that players will rob every living thing they come across and not save barmaids. In my experience running B/X for a decade, the game doesn't really turn everyone into murderous larcenous psychopaths. Of course it does create a more cavalier approach to heroism. Characters aren't heroes they are adventurers. If you want a campaign of heroes you don't use XP for gold. The game I am most familiar with is B/X. I enjoy the procedural elements of the game, but I preface this in that they tend to be better suited to a dungeon delve / adventuring tone as opposed to a heroic tone. But what I am talking about is the interactions between Turn based dungeon / wilderness exploration, wandering monsters, random reaction rolls, light source depletion over time. There is a lot of interesting game developments that happen just with the random procedural engine. Some, examples… Rolling an orc encounter with a friendly reaction result. Why are they friendly? Maybe they are being hunted by some even more powerful creature… maybe they will negotiate for help from the party. Rolling a brigand encounter with No. Appearing 1. Why is one lone brigand wandering the dungeon? Perhaps he was the last survivor of his adventuring party. Perhaps he's wounded. Will the party help him? What can they learn from him? A stuck door that is not able to be forced open. Does the party hack it open with axes? It will take time and the noise will call for possible encounters. Should they continue to explore, intead, and maybe find a way around it? These are all examples of encounters that happen that are besides the set piece room encounters. Events that require some improvisation and willingness to let the session go in unexpected directions. To me they are like improvisational prompts that challenge me as a DM to read the 'tea leaves' and piece together something from some random events. The game isn't fully known even to me. As a DM, I am playing along with the players and discovering the world with them. Sometimes a random encounter and the procedural element shapes the entire evening of play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What is the essence of D&D
Top