Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 3308333" data-attributes="member: 326">Hey mythusmage! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />*SNIP*Well I mentioned it once and then replied to people who responded to my initial comments - so I can't see how that common courtesy could be regarded as going on and on about something.  Lets stick with the obvious assumption that it will, since thats what common sense seems to suggest.Heres the thing. The board is only there to aid tactical situations, ie. combat. Just like castle maps and temple layouts in published adventures. So that invalidates your first reservation. I agree to the extent that people 'could' get the wrong impression of the game from the term 'boardgame'. But it would be exactly that - a wrong impression. It says nothing of the kind. Its not that casual or new gamers cannot play the game, simply that they are likely to be dissuaded from doing so by the sheer volume of rules central to the game.Elitist scaremongering.</blockquote>