Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 8232812" data-attributes="member: 5142">Your point was that you felt offended by pemerton's characterization of your preferred playstyle as &quot;playing to discover what's in the gm's notes&quot; and as such felt obligated to make that offense known through a passive aggressive remark against pemerton by implying that this analysis is shallow. It was hardly a deeper point than that. That said, if you don't think that your own biases are equally at play here, Bedrockgames, then I think you are sorely mistaken and also worth reflecting on. Hmmm... or maybe you think you are describing something accurately as a &quot;direct criticism of the discussion,&quot; but not seeing how your own bias is shaping the passive aggressive tone of your remarks. If you don't think something is a fair description, then I would suggest offering up with a fair description rather than making passive aggressive barbs and refusing to recognize them for what they were.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aldarc, post: 8232812, member: 5142"] Your point was that you felt offended by pemerton's characterization of your preferred playstyle as "playing to discover what's in the gm's notes" and as such felt obligated to make that offense known through a passive aggressive remark against pemerton by implying that this analysis is shallow. It was hardly a deeper point than that. That said, if you don't think that your own biases are equally at play here, Bedrockgames, then I think you are sorely mistaken and also worth reflecting on. Hmmm... or maybe you think you are describing something accurately as a "direct criticism of the discussion," but not seeing how your own bias is shaping the passive aggressive tone of your remarks. If you don't think something is a fair description, then I would suggest offering up with a fair description rather than making passive aggressive barbs and refusing to recognize them for what they were. [/QUOTE]

Verification