Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is the point of GM's notes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 8235335" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>It is.</p><p></p><p>But my suggestion (same as it has always been) is that we get better at it (pinning it down).</p><p></p><p>For instance, this might be how one would describe the play loop of a social conflict in a GM Curated, Interactive Sandbox, Skilled Play game:</p><p></p><p><strong>SOCIAL CONFLICT</strong></p><p></p><p>1) The GM rolls on the NPC Reaction Table for the primary NPC, taking any adjustment for PC Charisma Score or present/past PC activity. Example:</p><p></p><p>+2 for lead PC</p><p>- 1 for past transgressions against NPC motivations</p><p>+1 for decorum in arrangement of meeting.</p><p></p><p>+ 2 total.</p><p></p><p>2d6 + 2 = 9. Hospitable. NPC considers offer.</p><p></p><p>2) GM presents the situation which includes the setting, the relevant NPCs, and the depiction of their orientation of the PC based on the NPC Reaction Roll.</p><p></p><p>GM roleplays through the NPC, using their motivations, and presents the PCs with the NPC's position on the subject matter at hand. This should be something to either put the PCs on the defensive or provoke the players to present their own viewpoint through their PCs.</p><p></p><p>3) This back-and-forth continues (with a player possibly declaring an action that forces dice to be rolled - History or Insight to develop rapport for instance) until the GM decides that either the players has made the case and the NPC agrees (ending the social conflict), hasn't made the case and the NPC rebuffs them (ending the social conflict), or the GM is unsure if the case has been made. The GM then sets a DC (with the NPCs orientation as a base and adjusted for the factors of the NPC Reaction Roll and any transgression or well-made point in the course of conversation) and the player then makes a Charisma roll. If this Charisma roll meets or exceeds the DC, the NPC agrees to the PC proposition. If the Charisma roll does not meet or exceed the DC, the NPC rebuffs the PCs.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p></p><p>That expresses the elements of the play priorities/style pretty clearly.</p><p></p><p><strong>GM Curated</strong> (the GM created this NPC and the setting)</p><p></p><p><strong>Interactive Sandbox</strong> (the players interact with NPCs and the NPCs respond based on their motivations and resolution mechanics)</p><p></p><p><strong>Skilled Play</strong> (the players will be more apt to have success if they build their PCs correctly and declare actions/converse skillfully in the social conflict)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 8235335, member: 6696971"] It is. But my suggestion (same as it has always been) is that we get better at it (pinning it down). For instance, this might be how one would describe the play loop of a social conflict in a GM Curated, Interactive Sandbox, Skilled Play game: [B]SOCIAL CONFLICT[/B] 1) The GM rolls on the NPC Reaction Table for the primary NPC, taking any adjustment for PC Charisma Score or present/past PC activity. Example: +2 for lead PC - 1 for past transgressions against NPC motivations +1 for decorum in arrangement of meeting. + 2 total. 2d6 + 2 = 9. Hospitable. NPC considers offer. 2) GM presents the situation which includes the setting, the relevant NPCs, and the depiction of their orientation of the PC based on the NPC Reaction Roll. GM roleplays through the NPC, using their motivations, and presents the PCs with the NPC's position on the subject matter at hand. This should be something to either put the PCs on the defensive or provoke the players to present their own viewpoint through their PCs. 3) This back-and-forth continues (with a player possibly declaring an action that forces dice to be rolled - History or Insight to develop rapport for instance) until the GM decides that either the players has made the case and the NPC agrees (ending the social conflict), hasn't made the case and the NPC rebuffs them (ending the social conflict), or the GM is unsure if the case has been made. The GM then sets a DC (with the NPCs orientation as a base and adjusted for the factors of the NPC Reaction Roll and any transgression or well-made point in the course of conversation) and the player then makes a Charisma roll. If this Charisma roll meets or exceeds the DC, the NPC agrees to the PC proposition. If the Charisma roll does not meet or exceed the DC, the NPC rebuffs the PCs. [HR][/HR] That expresses the elements of the play priorities/style pretty clearly. [B]GM Curated[/B] (the GM created this NPC and the setting) [B]Interactive Sandbox[/B] (the players interact with NPCs and the NPCs respond based on their motivations and resolution mechanics) [B]Skilled Play[/B] (the players will be more apt to have success if they build their PCs correctly and declare actions/converse skillfully in the social conflict) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is the point of GM's notes?
Top