Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is the point of GM's notes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 8242636" data-attributes="member: 5142"><p>Okay, so let's make your bigger point even bigger. Take that hypothetical power imbalance that exists in this thread (or sub-forum) and then reverse it, magnify the scope, and apply it to the hobby at large. That broadly describes the "other side's" experience in our hobby. That's the sword of mainstream gaming that's been collectively pointed against the indie gaming scene (and the more story now-focused subset) for decades, constantly reminding indie gamers of how insignificant they are by comparison. The fact that a hypothetical power imbalance of conversational capital exists in isolated form in this thread is potentially short-sighted when looking at it from that bigger picture perspective. And that is one reason why I can't take the supposed "power imbalance" seriously at face value. It ignores the vast privilege at which more mainstream games (and their heart-breaker kin) and perspectives already wields as orthodoxy. </p><p></p><p>Another highly imperfect analogy: </p><p>[spoiler]It is similar to, though not in terms of meaningfully real stakes and scope of, LBGTQ+ discourse fighting an uphill battle to deconstruct mainstream cis-heteronormative societal discourse on sexuality, gender, and disability. Who gets to control or frame the terms? Who wields the power to define these things? Who gets the privilege to define "normal" or "man" or "woman" or "marriage"? You would no doubt agree that it would be quite silly if I went on a FTM thread as a cis male and said that they were pompous and arrogant for redefining terms for gender (and possibly more) as I traditionally knew them, that they were just engaging in pointless ivory tower pontifications that were detached from that of the vast majority of men, or even that I felt that there was an acute power imbalance of conversational capital that existed between me (a cis man) on a FTM thread discussing gender. Because outside of that thread, I have far more social privilege and acceptance of my gender as a cis male.[/spoiler]</p><p></p><p></p><p>It would be nice if you could do so without accusing others of being pompous, intellectual bullies, or pontificating when they do the same. That said, even if more mainstream AP/GM-driven play lies outside of your preferences, I would nevertheless estimate that your opinions are more closely aligned with mainstream gaming, particularly in regards to the GM/player power imbalance, than that of either [USER=42582]@pemerton[/USER] or [USER=6696971]@Manbearcat[/USER]'s games.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aldarc, post: 8242636, member: 5142"] Okay, so let's make your bigger point even bigger. Take that hypothetical power imbalance that exists in this thread (or sub-forum) and then reverse it, magnify the scope, and apply it to the hobby at large. That broadly describes the "other side's" experience in our hobby. That's the sword of mainstream gaming that's been collectively pointed against the indie gaming scene (and the more story now-focused subset) for decades, constantly reminding indie gamers of how insignificant they are by comparison. The fact that a hypothetical power imbalance of conversational capital exists in isolated form in this thread is potentially short-sighted when looking at it from that bigger picture perspective. And that is one reason why I can't take the supposed "power imbalance" seriously at face value. It ignores the vast privilege at which more mainstream games (and their heart-breaker kin) and perspectives already wields as orthodoxy. Another highly imperfect analogy: [spoiler]It is similar to, though not in terms of meaningfully real stakes and scope of, LBGTQ+ discourse fighting an uphill battle to deconstruct mainstream cis-heteronormative societal discourse on sexuality, gender, and disability. Who gets to control or frame the terms? Who wields the power to define these things? Who gets the privilege to define "normal" or "man" or "woman" or "marriage"? You would no doubt agree that it would be quite silly if I went on a FTM thread as a cis male and said that they were pompous and arrogant for redefining terms for gender (and possibly more) as I traditionally knew them, that they were just engaging in pointless ivory tower pontifications that were detached from that of the vast majority of men, or even that I felt that there was an acute power imbalance of conversational capital that existed between me (a cis man) on a FTM thread discussing gender. Because outside of that thread, I have far more social privilege and acceptance of my gender as a cis male.[/spoiler] It would be nice if you could do so without accusing others of being pompous, intellectual bullies, or pontificating when they do the same. That said, even if more mainstream AP/GM-driven play lies outside of your preferences, I would nevertheless estimate that your opinions are more closely aligned with mainstream gaming, particularly in regards to the GM/player power imbalance, than that of either [USER=42582]@pemerton[/USER] or [USER=6696971]@Manbearcat[/USER]'s games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is the point of GM's notes?
Top