Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is the point of GM's notes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 8244512" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>One final bit.</p><p></p><p>I think the sell is particularly impossible to me because I've interacted with so many tenured GMs on here who (with all the respect in the world I can muster) aren't remotely sufficiently informed about the prospects of dozens and dozens of physical tasks in our own world, let alone a fantasy world where a Fighter is routinely somehow dealing with otherworldly kinetic energy deficits (some just beyond comprehension like wading into melee with an Ancient Red Wyrm) that our real life athletes couldn't even dream of dealing with.</p><p></p><p>I'm a totally average Lead Climber and Boulderer. Average as hell.</p><p></p><p>But I would guarantee that a large cross-section of competent 5e GMs would look at a boulder problem and give me a DC that in no way reflects what it should be (either <strong>subjectively for me *</strong> or objectively against all of the world). I'd look at a Tier 3 problem and, depending deeply on the dynamics of the climb, I could be anywhere from "no...I cannot climb this obstacle" to "this is a joke." And they wouldn't know how to adjudicate that.</p><p></p><p>And again, I'm a nothingburger, 43 year old, extremely amateur climber with a legion of injuries from 30+ years in hard athletics. Compared to some of the freakishly power: weight ratio, +8 Ape-Index, 20 year old climbers (and these are WELL within the normal distribution of just competent climbers), I may as well be strapped to a gurney and catatonic. Most GMs would look at some of these climbs and they would just flat say "no...no chance" to the Fighter who wanted to climb it (with full marks for irony, the same badass Fighter that just whooped an Ancient Red Wyrm in melee!). A few <em>may </em>say "DC 30." Yet, I see a huge regime of kids routinely pull off these climbs!</p><p></p><p>I'm just enormously skeptical (and rightly so) of damn near every GM I've encountered on ENWorld being able to consistently synchronize with me on a DC in my head when I conceive of a physical obstacle/feat of athleticism.</p><p></p><p>Oh and that <strong>*</strong> is a HUGE (e) which I forgot in my matrix above. Is a GM <strong>setting their DC based on the target attempting it (subjective DC)</strong> or is it an objective DC based on the obstacle itself? In that thread in 2016, it was not only all over the map on a per person basis...each individual GM would toggle subjective/objective depending on what the action declaration was?</p><p></p><p>The built-in volatility in action resolution is crazy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 8244512, member: 6696971"] One final bit. I think the sell is particularly impossible to me because I've interacted with so many tenured GMs on here who (with all the respect in the world I can muster) aren't remotely sufficiently informed about the prospects of dozens and dozens of physical tasks in our own world, let alone a fantasy world where a Fighter is routinely somehow dealing with otherworldly kinetic energy deficits (some just beyond comprehension like wading into melee with an Ancient Red Wyrm) that our real life athletes couldn't even dream of dealing with. I'm a totally average Lead Climber and Boulderer. Average as hell. But I would guarantee that a large cross-section of competent 5e GMs would look at a boulder problem and give me a DC that in no way reflects what it should be (either [B]subjectively for me *[/B] or objectively against all of the world). I'd look at a Tier 3 problem and, depending deeply on the dynamics of the climb, I could be anywhere from "no...I cannot climb this obstacle" to "this is a joke." And they wouldn't know how to adjudicate that. And again, I'm a nothingburger, 43 year old, extremely amateur climber with a legion of injuries from 30+ years in hard athletics. Compared to some of the freakishly power: weight ratio, +8 Ape-Index, 20 year old climbers (and these are WELL within the normal distribution of just competent climbers), I may as well be strapped to a gurney and catatonic. Most GMs would look at some of these climbs and they would just flat say "no...no chance" to the Fighter who wanted to climb it (with full marks for irony, the same badass Fighter that just whooped an Ancient Red Wyrm in melee!). A few [I]may [/I]say "DC 30." Yet, I see a huge regime of kids routinely pull off these climbs! I'm just enormously skeptical (and rightly so) of damn near every GM I've encountered on ENWorld being able to consistently synchronize with me on a DC in my head when I conceive of a physical obstacle/feat of athleticism. Oh and that [B]*[/B] is a HUGE (e) which I forgot in my matrix above. Is a GM [B]setting their DC based on the target attempting it (subjective DC)[/B] or is it an objective DC based on the obstacle itself? In that thread in 2016, it was not only all over the map on a per person basis...each individual GM would toggle subjective/objective depending on what the action declaration was? The built-in volatility in action resolution is crazy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is the point of GM's notes?
Top