Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="prabe" data-source="post: 8253660" data-attributes="member: 7016699">Yeah. I suppose putting my description of why I don't like the style before my statement of strongly not liking the style could make it seem as though I'm slagging people for liking the style. That certainly wasn't my intent.As I said before, I could probably make it clearer I'm describing my own experiences of a playstyle I haven't ever enjoyed.That's fair, but if I were to get a lot of pushback about my description/s of AP-style play, I might consider that there's some problem with my description/s, not the people pushing back.I don't think it's wildly inaccurate, but I think it undersells A) the extent to which the GM has any interest in finding out about either the characters or the world and B) the extent to which authoring something at the table is different from doing so at one's desk (it's the difference between being the sole author and being a co-author).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="prabe, post: 8253660, member: 7016699"] Yeah. I suppose putting my description of why I don't like the style before my statement of strongly not liking the style could make it seem as though I'm slagging people for liking the style. That certainly wasn't my intent. As I said before, I could probably make it clearer I'm describing my own experiences of a playstyle I haven't ever enjoyed. That's fair, but if I were to get a lot of pushback about my description/s of AP-style play, I might consider that there's some problem with my description/s, not the people pushing back. I don't think it's wildly inaccurate, but I think it undersells A) the extent to which the GM has any interest in finding out about either the characters or the world and B) the extent to which authoring something at the table is different from doing so at one's desk (it's the difference between being the sole author and being a co-author). [/QUOTE]

Verification