Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 8255151" data-attributes="member: 16814">Man, this is really after you, isn't it?&nbsp; Responding twice to the same post?&nbsp; You should charge me rent for all this space in your head!&nbsp; I'm cheap, though, so I'll probably skip paying and you'll have to evict me, but I'll warn you I might sneak back in and squat.Max is usually fully invested in informal logical fallacies.&nbsp; I've been around that block with him a few times.&nbsp; S'ok, I just tend to point them out from time to time.&nbsp; And, yes, you are getting dogpiled.&nbsp; It's not because people are mean, or that you're a visionary being set upon by the masses, but rather that your recent arguments are so outlandishly framed that they invite lots of responses to the negative.&nbsp; You've literally claimed that you're worried that using &quot;fiction&quot; will cause undue confusion in people if allowed out of this thread, which is just silly because it's been in the wild, used exactly as it has been in this thread, for decades.&nbsp; It's not a new thing, and your fears have not come to fruition.&nbsp; I think the fearmongering thing is, as you noted, hyperbolic, but it at least gave you a new vector for claiming to be a victim instead of examining the silliness of some of your arguments (specifically the &quot;fiction&quot; one, oh, and the claiming that people are denying &quot;living world&quot; is even possible -- I don't know how anyone could say this, as no one outside of you and a few others even understand what it means and no one's bothered to put out a good explanation -- hmm, maybe it doesn't exist?).&nbsp; I hope that works out well for you, you seem to be pretty adept at managing these things, given that we're so far into this thread and you've managed to make it about you and your concern over words.&nbsp; Kudos!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 8255151, member: 16814"] Man, this is really after you, isn't it? Responding twice to the same post? You should charge me rent for all this space in your head! I'm cheap, though, so I'll probably skip paying and you'll have to evict me, but I'll warn you I might sneak back in and squat. Max is usually fully invested in informal logical fallacies. I've been around that block with him a few times. S'ok, I just tend to point them out from time to time. And, yes, you are getting dogpiled. It's not because people are mean, or that you're a visionary being set upon by the masses, but rather that your recent arguments are so outlandishly framed that they invite lots of responses to the negative. You've literally claimed that you're worried that using "fiction" will cause undue confusion in people if allowed out of this thread, which is just silly because it's been in the wild, used exactly as it has been in this thread, for decades. It's not a new thing, and your fears have not come to fruition. I think the fearmongering thing is, as you noted, hyperbolic, but it at least gave you a new vector for claiming to be a victim instead of examining the silliness of some of your arguments (specifically the "fiction" one, oh, and the claiming that people are denying "living world" is even possible -- I don't know how anyone could say this, as no one outside of you and a few others even understand what it means and no one's bothered to put out a good explanation -- hmm, maybe it doesn't exist?). I hope that works out well for you, you seem to be pretty adept at managing these things, given that we're so far into this thread and you've managed to make it about you and your concern over words. Kudos! [/QUOTE]

Verification