Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 9362046" data-attributes="member: 92511">(bolding mine)Putting aside your right to be aribiter for what you consider/accept as &quot;a rational reason,&quot; for yourself, I am very interested in hearing what the above bolded section means. I've seen this argument, in several threads (usually as refers to psionics, in some sorcerer threads also) over the years, but am completely at a loss as to what that is supposed to mean.Why would having a &quot;slot system&quot; for class A, and a &quot;point system&quot; for class B in the same game alleged to be &quot;too complex! can't possibly work! too much for players to grasp/handle!&quot;What does a &quot;better design of the core magic system&quot; look like? What is it supposed to have...? or not have?... as compared to the &quot;1-5 or 7 or 9 spell levels progression, with increasing numbers of slots to X for this class, Y for that, to Z for the other...&quot;&nbsp; that we have now?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 9362046, member: 92511"] (bolding mine) Putting aside your right to be aribiter for what you consider/accept as "a rational reason," for yourself, I am very interested in hearing what the above bolded section[I][B] means[/B][/I]. I've seen this argument, in several threads (usually as refers to psionics, in some sorcerer threads also) over the years, but am completely at a loss as to what that is supposed to mean. Why would having a "slot system" for class A, and a "point system" for class B in the same game alleged to be "too complex! can't possibly work! too much for players to grasp/handle!" What does a "better design of the core magic system" look like? What is it supposed to have...? or not have?... as compared to the "1-5 or 7 or 9 spell levels progression, with increasing numbers of slots to X for this class, Y for that, to Z for the other..." that we have now? [/QUOTE]

Verification