Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 835545" data-attributes="member: 7635">This one is self-explanitory, which class is the worst designed in third edition (via the unrevised rules). The nominee's are:Barbarian: One trick pony thanks to limited rage, all offense, no defense. Bard: Jack of few skills, master of nothing. Poor at almost everything he does. Cleric: Relies on heavy buffing to be useful. Domains too weak or too stong, based on deity. Druid: Poor armor, stupid weapon restriction, situational spells, and confusing wildshape.Fighter: boring at high levels, Charm bait thanks to poor saves.Monk: Lots of weak or uninspiring class abilities. Poor fighter, poor scout, class abilities come too late (Ki strike). Poopy multi-class restriction. Paladin: Three levels awesome, 17 levels boring. Poopy multi-class restriction.Psion: Multiple stat dependency, powers that don't scale, much of his area of concern covered by cleric or wizard.Psychic Warrior: Like a cleric, but he CAN'T HEAL! Ranger: Poopy TWF, not enough skill points, too dependent on DM to make his class abilities useful. Rogue: Sneak Atk too situational, poor offense and adequate defense. Easy to kill in melee. Sorcerer: 45 spells, period. No useful skills or bonus feats like wizard, familiar a liability, slower spell progession. Wizard: Spellbook and familiar liability, very dependent on magic items to say competitive, very fragile, weak to start, powerful at end.</blockquote>