Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What is this I don't even
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wayne62682" data-source="post: 5542380" data-attributes="member: 40455"><p>Coming back to the game, what sits "odd" with me is the way the divide (between Essentials classes and pre-Essentials classes) feels. For instance, I have a character concept I'm working on and the Essentials class doesn't quite fit (rather, the concept doesn't quite fit the narrow definition of the Essentials class), but using the older stuff still kind of feels like using "obsolete" rules (even though it's not - kind of hard to explain) because the Essentials style is the new style moving forward.</p><p></p><p>What I would honestly like to see, and I'm probably going to be lynched for saying it, is for the Essentials builds (or whatever the technical term is for them now) to be expanded to the extent that the old 2E Kits (yes, I said Kits) were, in that you could really customize the fine-grained details of your character (of course they'd have to be better balanced than some of the kits were... looking at you, Cavalier Kit). If Essentials really is the way they plan on going, then I want to see these builds become the new "class". They shouldn't ever add a new <strong>class</strong> unless it's for something entirely new (e.g. new power source, brand new mechanics - for instance if they decided to bring back Incarnum to 4e); everything else should be an Essentials-type build for an existing class. I would even go so far as to say I wouldn't mind the return of the "Complete X Handbook" books, full of RP tips and extra builds for a particular class. Not being in publishing I have no idea if that would sell or not (probably not, limited audience and all that) but that's what <strong>I</strong> would like to see <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Right now the issue is the E-line isn't defined enough to accommodate varied concepts; that's not a big deal since you can just build a pre-E character, but down the road I'm sure the intent will be that the old books will be obsoleted, so the E-class style needs to expand to allow for various concepts, not a basic one or two and that's all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wayne62682, post: 5542380, member: 40455"] Coming back to the game, what sits "odd" with me is the way the divide (between Essentials classes and pre-Essentials classes) feels. For instance, I have a character concept I'm working on and the Essentials class doesn't quite fit (rather, the concept doesn't quite fit the narrow definition of the Essentials class), but using the older stuff still kind of feels like using "obsolete" rules (even though it's not - kind of hard to explain) because the Essentials style is the new style moving forward. What I would honestly like to see, and I'm probably going to be lynched for saying it, is for the Essentials builds (or whatever the technical term is for them now) to be expanded to the extent that the old 2E Kits (yes, I said Kits) were, in that you could really customize the fine-grained details of your character (of course they'd have to be better balanced than some of the kits were... looking at you, Cavalier Kit). If Essentials really is the way they plan on going, then I want to see these builds become the new "class". They shouldn't ever add a new [b]class[/b] unless it's for something entirely new (e.g. new power source, brand new mechanics - for instance if they decided to bring back Incarnum to 4e); everything else should be an Essentials-type build for an existing class. I would even go so far as to say I wouldn't mind the return of the "Complete X Handbook" books, full of RP tips and extra builds for a particular class. Not being in publishing I have no idea if that would sell or not (probably not, limited audience and all that) but that's what [b]I[/b] would like to see :) Right now the issue is the E-line isn't defined enough to accommodate varied concepts; that's not a big deal since you can just build a pre-E character, but down the road I'm sure the intent will be that the old books will be obsoleted, so the E-class style needs to expand to allow for various concepts, not a basic one or two and that's all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What is this I don't even
Top