Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is *worldbuilding* for?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 7335652" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>Where I come in on this is as follows:</p><p></p><p>1) I write a (what should be) completely non-contentious 7 statements that basically just aggregate what 3-4 advocating posters have conveyed (in a few cases, word for word regurgitation or even throttling back the rhetoric; eg GM IS GOD/MY GAME to “its the GMs game/table).</p><p></p><p>Those aggregated statements are profoundly over-represented on ENWorld these days (the evidence for that is overwhelming) so I call it “collective” (do we really need to haggle over collective versus majority versus consensus?).</p><p></p><p>2) I write 2 more statements that I caveat as much more contentious and likely/possibly not majority held (They get disputed nearly as much as the get affirmed it seems).</p><p> </p><p>3) I get called out for extremism, middle-excluding, over-generalizing...so basically my intellectual integrity challenged.</p><p></p><p>4) Meanwhile, the same user basically restates/accidentally affirms what I write in those 7 in subsequent answers (!)...fails to acknowledge what has been said by advocates in this thread (much more aggressively in this thread, before, during, and after that exchange)...while simultaneously obfuscating discussion and bogging it down with needless haggling over classification (back to 1).</p><p></p><p>Oh, and calls me out after I publicly (on purpose obviously) praise pemerton for not being a jerk even though a specific (different) user was being a terrific one to him while offering precisely 0 substance to the conversation (trolling)!</p><p></p><p>That is about the score of it as I can see it. I’m more than fine with minutae and nuance of opinion. I love it. Let’s analyze and break down GMing techniques/play priorities/rule paradigms all day long in deep nuance.</p><p></p><p>I’m not ok with the afformentioned exchange because it pollutes the technical breakdown signal, because I work very hard on my integrity, and because my time is limited (so I don’t want to have to waste time on non gaming stuff).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 7335652, member: 6696971"] Where I come in on this is as follows: 1) I write a (what should be) completely non-contentious 7 statements that basically just aggregate what 3-4 advocating posters have conveyed (in a few cases, word for word regurgitation or even throttling back the rhetoric; eg GM IS GOD/MY GAME to “its the GMs game/table). Those aggregated statements are profoundly over-represented on ENWorld these days (the evidence for that is overwhelming) so I call it “collective” (do we really need to haggle over collective versus majority versus consensus?). 2) I write 2 more statements that I caveat as much more contentious and likely/possibly not majority held (They get disputed nearly as much as the get affirmed it seems). 3) I get called out for extremism, middle-excluding, over-generalizing...so basically my intellectual integrity challenged. 4) Meanwhile, the same user basically restates/accidentally affirms what I write in those 7 in subsequent answers (!)...fails to acknowledge what has been said by advocates in this thread (much more aggressively in this thread, before, during, and after that exchange)...while simultaneously obfuscating discussion and bogging it down with needless haggling over classification (back to 1). Oh, and calls me out after I publicly (on purpose obviously) praise pemerton for not being a jerk even though a specific (different) user was being a terrific one to him while offering precisely 0 substance to the conversation (trolling)! That is about the score of it as I can see it. I’m more than fine with minutae and nuance of opinion. I love it. Let’s analyze and break down GMing techniques/play priorities/rule paradigms all day long in deep nuance. I’m not ok with the afformentioned exchange because it pollutes the technical breakdown signal, because I work very hard on my integrity, and because my time is limited (so I don’t want to have to waste time on non gaming stuff). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is *worldbuilding* for?
Top