Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is *worldbuilding* for?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 7357759" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Eh, while 'classic' D&D seems to have persisted in encouraging a very final interpretation of 'character death' (defeat in combat) long after it stopped always serving the agenda, modern games don't suffer from that problem so much. I mean, sure, if the whole framing of the thing is "lets stake the lives of our characters on success, we'll hold nothing back, success or death!" then they're ASKING for death! So give it to them! </p><p></p><p>OTOH if they're maybe NOT asking for death then there's always logic in a parley. I mean, MOST bad guys are not averse to ransoms, slavery, etc. You can always kill 'em later. A GM can EASILY come up with a frame for a post-capture type of scene. I know the old, "you wake up some time later" thing is perhaps a bit old and tired and you don't want to use it constantly, but once the PCs are cornered there's nothing stopping them from tossing down there weapons, perhaps in a "we'll spare killing a whole bunch of your minions if you take us prisoner and let us live" kind of thing. </p><p></p><p>So, meh, I'm not sure most battles MUST be life-and-death struggles. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, its easy enough for it to just be the GM saying "Nope, that isn't possible here!" which is NOT forbidden. I mean, these kinds of games are intended to be driven by "say yes" type GMing, but there's ALWAYS a limit to that! I mean, characters can only do certain things. Your average dwarf cannot just say "I sprout wings and fly away" any old time, and even [MENTION=42582]pemerton[/MENTION] is going to have some serious questions about that! I know it wouldn't fly (hehe) in my game! Actually it MIGHT, if you're level 27 and you appeal to your patron deity to save your bacon in a really important battle! Of course there WILL be consequences... I'd point out that there's a chart for this in the 1e DMG p111 where the guidelines work out that a character of level 15 who has never asked for divine favor before, and has reasonable alignment behavior has a 41% chance of such intervention! (15% for level, 25% for 'serving deity proximately', and 1% for 'diametrically opposed alignment'). It won't happen every time, but even crazy stuff is intended to be possible in D&D. </p><p></p><p>Point is, I don't think you're really imposing any consideration on the game that isn't already there in some form. Yes, players in a player-centered type of Standard Narrative game should consider the narrative, but that's why they're playing in such a game, right? Players in ANY game have a similar situation, they're expected to play in a way that shows some deference to the character as an individual. They aren't supposed to just commit suicide because it is fun for the player, or assassinate the other PCs just for the amusement of the player. I'd point out that this sort of problematic behavior is all too well known in games! So I would think that pushing the bounds in terms of player authority when they have narrative agency is really nothing surprising or new. </p><p></p><p>Obviously there may be some people who just don't want to play this way, but IME that is extremely rare. It may take presenting the game in a way that players relate to when they first encounter such a game, but in the form [MENTION=42582]pemerton[/MENTION] is espousing, which is really the mildest form, pretty much everyone I've tried it on just 'got it'. They produced much more interesting and useful backstory, they pointed out times and places in play which they felt related to their character's concerns, and took those concerns as a significant element of play to be exploited for their entertainment. I'm quite positive players exist who will absolutely refuse to play this way, but its not a huge percentage of those I've met.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, but I think they'd see the logic in something else. Some sort of 'deus ex machina', an offer to accept their surrender, or the sudden arrival of an ally, etc. is often quite plausible. It might, again, get a little contrived, but that's part of the whole concept, at least in many genre, that the heroes get these sorts of breaks, otherwise they wouldn't have survived as heroes. </p><p></p><p>And that's always how I look at it, the story is like an old tale that is being retold. You wouldn't even hear it if the orcs slaughtered the PCs on day 3 of their story and roasted them over a fire. Somehow they pulled through. Maybe not every time, maybe the story is about how they died heroically, but something interesting happened. So there must have been some fate involved to pull their fat out of the fire a few times (or not I guess if they're skilled/lucky enough).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 7357759, member: 82106"] Eh, while 'classic' D&D seems to have persisted in encouraging a very final interpretation of 'character death' (defeat in combat) long after it stopped always serving the agenda, modern games don't suffer from that problem so much. I mean, sure, if the whole framing of the thing is "lets stake the lives of our characters on success, we'll hold nothing back, success or death!" then they're ASKING for death! So give it to them! OTOH if they're maybe NOT asking for death then there's always logic in a parley. I mean, MOST bad guys are not averse to ransoms, slavery, etc. You can always kill 'em later. A GM can EASILY come up with a frame for a post-capture type of scene. I know the old, "you wake up some time later" thing is perhaps a bit old and tired and you don't want to use it constantly, but once the PCs are cornered there's nothing stopping them from tossing down there weapons, perhaps in a "we'll spare killing a whole bunch of your minions if you take us prisoner and let us live" kind of thing. So, meh, I'm not sure most battles MUST be life-and-death struggles. Well, its easy enough for it to just be the GM saying "Nope, that isn't possible here!" which is NOT forbidden. I mean, these kinds of games are intended to be driven by "say yes" type GMing, but there's ALWAYS a limit to that! I mean, characters can only do certain things. Your average dwarf cannot just say "I sprout wings and fly away" any old time, and even [MENTION=42582]pemerton[/MENTION] is going to have some serious questions about that! I know it wouldn't fly (hehe) in my game! Actually it MIGHT, if you're level 27 and you appeal to your patron deity to save your bacon in a really important battle! Of course there WILL be consequences... I'd point out that there's a chart for this in the 1e DMG p111 where the guidelines work out that a character of level 15 who has never asked for divine favor before, and has reasonable alignment behavior has a 41% chance of such intervention! (15% for level, 25% for 'serving deity proximately', and 1% for 'diametrically opposed alignment'). It won't happen every time, but even crazy stuff is intended to be possible in D&D. Point is, I don't think you're really imposing any consideration on the game that isn't already there in some form. Yes, players in a player-centered type of Standard Narrative game should consider the narrative, but that's why they're playing in such a game, right? Players in ANY game have a similar situation, they're expected to play in a way that shows some deference to the character as an individual. They aren't supposed to just commit suicide because it is fun for the player, or assassinate the other PCs just for the amusement of the player. I'd point out that this sort of problematic behavior is all too well known in games! So I would think that pushing the bounds in terms of player authority when they have narrative agency is really nothing surprising or new. Obviously there may be some people who just don't want to play this way, but IME that is extremely rare. It may take presenting the game in a way that players relate to when they first encounter such a game, but in the form [MENTION=42582]pemerton[/MENTION] is espousing, which is really the mildest form, pretty much everyone I've tried it on just 'got it'. They produced much more interesting and useful backstory, they pointed out times and places in play which they felt related to their character's concerns, and took those concerns as a significant element of play to be exploited for their entertainment. I'm quite positive players exist who will absolutely refuse to play this way, but its not a huge percentage of those I've met. No, but I think they'd see the logic in something else. Some sort of 'deus ex machina', an offer to accept their surrender, or the sudden arrival of an ally, etc. is often quite plausible. It might, again, get a little contrived, but that's part of the whole concept, at least in many genre, that the heroes get these sorts of breaks, otherwise they wouldn't have survived as heroes. And that's always how I look at it, the story is like an old tale that is being retold. You wouldn't even hear it if the orcs slaughtered the PCs on day 3 of their story and roasted them over a fire. Somehow they pulled through. Maybe not every time, maybe the story is about how they died heroically, but something interesting happened. So there must have been some fate involved to pull their fat out of the fire a few times (or not I guess if they're skilled/lucky enough). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is *worldbuilding* for?
Top