Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is *worldbuilding* for?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 7360696" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Instead of abstract speculation about how "story now" or "the standard narrativistic model" games are played, it might be better to consider actual examples of games written to be played in that style, or at actual play examples of play in that style.</p><p></p><p>But anyway, even if one sticks to abstract description, <a href="https://isabout.wordpress.com/2010/02/16/the-pitfalls-of-narrative-technique-in-rpg-play/" target="_blank">Eero Tuovinen says</a></p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">[the] gamemaster . . . frame<s> scenes according to dramatic needs (that is, go[es] where the action is) and provoke<s> thematic moments (defined in narrativistic theory as moments of in-character action that carry weight as commentary on the game’s premise) by introducing complications.</s></s></p><p><s><s></s></s></p><p><s><s></s></s></p><p><s><s>And <a href="http://www.indie-rpgs.com/_articles/narr_essay.html" target="_blank">Ron Edwards says</a></s></s></p><p><s><s></s></s></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><s><s>Story Now requires that at least one engaging issue or problematic feature of human existence be <em>addressed </em>in the process of role-playing . . . [which] means . . . [d]eveloping the issue as a source of continued conflict, perhaps changing any number of things about it, such as which side is being taken by a given character, or providing more depth to why the antagonistic side of the issue exists at all [and r]esolving the issue through the decisions of the players of the protagonists . . .</p><p></s></s></p><p><s><s>There is nothing here about "bringing the player's agenda into crisis", or "attacking" that agenda.</s></s></p><p><s><s></s></s></p><p><s><s>Both emphasise player decision-making ("in-character action", "decisions of the players of the protagonists") that is provoked by "complications"/"continued conflict" which speak to "dramatic needs"/"the engaging issue" and thereby yield "thematic moments"/"development of the isssue".</s></s></p><p><s><s></s></s></p><p><s><s>This could be about crisis, but need not be. Being a poor sorceror with only a limited ability to read magical auras, but in need of items to help free one's brother from demonic possession, means that the offer of an angel feather for sale provokes a choice for the PC, and thus a decision by the player. (In Edwards' terms, the "issue" is implicit but fairly straightforward: what will I risk, and what forces beyond my control will I treat with, in order to free my brother from the forces beyond his control?) But this is not a crisis. It doesn't attack the player's agenda (of having the PC find items to save his brother). It puts that agenda to the fore of play, however.</s></s></p><p><s><s></s></s></p><p><s><s>The first sentence rests on a false premise.</s></s></p><p><s><s></s></s></p><p><s><s>Players in "player-facing" games cannot avoid <em>dealing with their own agendas</em>. But that does not seem to be a burden on agency!</s></s></p><p><s><s></s></s></p><p><s><s>And as [MENTION=82106]AbdulAlhazred[/MENTION] has pointed out, resting in 5e seems to be about resources rather than pacing. It's true that the GM can use his/her control over "the plot", or framing, to create "story losses" (what AbdulAlhazred calls "plot costs") that the players might risk if they renew their resources - but the risking of story losses for resources doesn't really seem to be a strong or even distinctive form of player agency at all. Not particularly strong, because the bulk of the agency seems to be in the GM's hands; and not distinctive, because a player in a "player-facing" game can often spend a "move" or "turn" trying to establish an augment of some sort rather than actually tackling the situation head-on. (Even if there is no literal action economy, trying to establish the augment is an action that risks failure, which can then be narrated as consequences that consist in the situation getting worse for the PC, which - in terms of fictional content, if not the process of play that generates it - is analogous to the story loss of the GM-driven game.)</s></s></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 7360696, member: 42582"] Instead of abstract speculation about how "story now" or "the standard narrativistic model" games are played, it might be better to consider actual examples of games written to be played in that style, or at actual play examples of play in that style. But anyway, even if one sticks to abstract description, [url=https://isabout.wordpress.com/2010/02/16/the-pitfalls-of-narrative-technique-in-rpg-play/]Eero Tuovinen says[/url] [indent][the] gamemaster . . . frame[s] scenes according to dramatic needs (that is, go[es] where the action is) and provoke[s] thematic moments (defined in narrativistic theory as moments of in-character action that carry weight as commentary on the game’s premise) by introducing complications.[/s][/s][/indent][s][s] And [url=http://www.indie-rpgs.com/_articles/narr_essay.html]Ron Edwards says[/url] [indent]Story Now requires that at least one engaging issue or problematic feature of human existence be [I]addressed [/I]in the process of role-playing . . . [which] means . . . [d]eveloping the issue as a source of continued conflict, perhaps changing any number of things about it, such as which side is being taken by a given character, or providing more depth to why the antagonistic side of the issue exists at all [and r]esolving the issue through the decisions of the players of the protagonists . . .[/indent] There is nothing here about "bringing the player's agenda into crisis", or "attacking" that agenda. Both emphasise player decision-making ("in-character action", "decisions of the players of the protagonists") that is provoked by "complications"/"continued conflict" which speak to "dramatic needs"/"the engaging issue" and thereby yield "thematic moments"/"development of the isssue". This could be about crisis, but need not be. Being a poor sorceror with only a limited ability to read magical auras, but in need of items to help free one's brother from demonic possession, means that the offer of an angel feather for sale provokes a choice for the PC, and thus a decision by the player. (In Edwards' terms, the "issue" is implicit but fairly straightforward: what will I risk, and what forces beyond my control will I treat with, in order to free my brother from the forces beyond his control?) But this is not a crisis. It doesn't attack the player's agenda (of having the PC find items to save his brother). It puts that agenda to the fore of play, however. The first sentence rests on a false premise. Players in "player-facing" games cannot avoid [I]dealing with their own agendas[/I]. But that does not seem to be a burden on agency! And as [MENTION=82106]AbdulAlhazred[/MENTION] has pointed out, resting in 5e seems to be about resources rather than pacing. It's true that the GM can use his/her control over "the plot", or framing, to create "story losses" (what AbdulAlhazred calls "plot costs") that the players might risk if they renew their resources - but the risking of story losses for resources doesn't really seem to be a strong or even distinctive form of player agency at all. Not particularly strong, because the bulk of the agency seems to be in the GM's hands; and not distinctive, because a player in a "player-facing" game can often spend a "move" or "turn" trying to establish an augment of some sort rather than actually tackling the situation head-on. (Even if there is no literal action economy, trying to establish the augment is an action that risks failure, which can then be narrated as consequences that consist in the situation getting worse for the PC, which - in terms of fictional content, if not the process of play that generates it - is analogous to the story loss of the GM-driven game.)[/s][/s] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is *worldbuilding* for?
Top