Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is *worldbuilding* for?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aenghus" data-source="post: 7373906" data-attributes="member: 2656"><p>The vast majority of RPG games I have played in have been GM-driven games, and I have enjoyed or at least appreciated many of them. A few were consistently great, most had highs and lows, with varying proportions of high and low.</p><p></p><p>IMO to get the best out of such games places some constraints on the players. The players need to learn at least enough about the setting to get by, even if they are playing ignorant outsiders at the start. How much work this takes varies from game to game and group to group. </p><p></p><p>If a PC is supposed to be from the setting the player should make some effort to fit them to that part of the setting, ideally with the GM's help. Tolerance of special snowflakes varies a lot from group to group, with some creativity very unusual PCs can be grafted in if that's desired. Alternatively, it's common for GMs to modify or ban PCs who don't fit his or her concept of the setting.</p><p></p><p>PC goals need to fit the setting. If the players are ignorant of the setting at the start of the game, they don't know enough to set any but the most conservative of goals with any expectation of success. In some GM-driven games PC goals might be discussed with the GM and arrived at with collaboration. In others, they are entirely the business of the player and there are zero assurances of relevance or closure. Expected PC lifespan has a bearing on this, campaigns with high PC turnover don't encourage long term PC goals.</p><p></p><p>IMO proactive players who don't like conforming to someone else's setting don't do so well in GM-driven games with strong settings. Players who don't like learning settings may have issues as well.</p><p></p><p>There a whole load of reasons why players might stop engaging with the game, ignore plot hooks and turtle up. Acting out, attention seeking, feeling starved of enough information to make reasonable choices, setting dangers exceeding player expectations, concern the game is ignoring or misinterpreting their PC's goals, concern that plot hooks are irrelevant to the PC etc etc. Many of these can't be addressed properly in-game IMO and call for an OOC discussion to attempt a resolution.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aenghus, post: 7373906, member: 2656"] The vast majority of RPG games I have played in have been GM-driven games, and I have enjoyed or at least appreciated many of them. A few were consistently great, most had highs and lows, with varying proportions of high and low. IMO to get the best out of such games places some constraints on the players. The players need to learn at least enough about the setting to get by, even if they are playing ignorant outsiders at the start. How much work this takes varies from game to game and group to group. If a PC is supposed to be from the setting the player should make some effort to fit them to that part of the setting, ideally with the GM's help. Tolerance of special snowflakes varies a lot from group to group, with some creativity very unusual PCs can be grafted in if that's desired. Alternatively, it's common for GMs to modify or ban PCs who don't fit his or her concept of the setting. PC goals need to fit the setting. If the players are ignorant of the setting at the start of the game, they don't know enough to set any but the most conservative of goals with any expectation of success. In some GM-driven games PC goals might be discussed with the GM and arrived at with collaboration. In others, they are entirely the business of the player and there are zero assurances of relevance or closure. Expected PC lifespan has a bearing on this, campaigns with high PC turnover don't encourage long term PC goals. IMO proactive players who don't like conforming to someone else's setting don't do so well in GM-driven games with strong settings. Players who don't like learning settings may have issues as well. There a whole load of reasons why players might stop engaging with the game, ignore plot hooks and turtle up. Acting out, attention seeking, feeling starved of enough information to make reasonable choices, setting dangers exceeding player expectations, concern the game is ignoring or misinterpreting their PC's goals, concern that plot hooks are irrelevant to the PC etc etc. Many of these can't be addressed properly in-game IMO and call for an OOC discussion to attempt a resolution. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is *worldbuilding* for?
Top