Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is WOTC's Vision For The GSL?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lizard" data-source="post: 4324393" data-attributes="member: 1054"><p>(From another thread)</p><p>It's really, really, hard not to keep coming round to "WOTC felt somehow obliged to produce a license, but really doesn't know what they want from third parties". Dancey's vision was clear: He wanted D20 Uber Alles. He wanted to encourage every company to buy into the D20 system and spread it throughout gaming. One die to rule them all. The OGC/PI split was there to encourage companies to produce valuable IP (settings, backgrounds, fluff) without fear of it being "stolen", while keeping all mechanics open so that they system could grow. It might not have worked out perfectly, but the "vision" was clear. I don't know what WOTCs "vision" is for the GSL. </p><p></p><p>So I'm asking: What does WOTC want/expect from the GSL? We had a lot of essays from Ryan Dancey about what he expected, what he believed, what motivated him, what his philosophy was, what his influences were, and so on. We haven't seen anything like that from WOTC this time around. We have the license itself, and, on the surface, the "vision" we get from the actual text is "We're not really comfortable with this whole concept". However, if they were really the case, there wouldn't BE a license, so, I have to assume that the license isn't the entirety of the "vision". I'd like to know what the purpose, goals, etc of the license is.</p><p></p><p>("Sell more PHBs" doesn't cut it. With the license as written, it's hard to imagine any produce for it which wouldn't sell only to people already active in D&D. Under the OGL, a cool setting (such as Freeport) or a cool variant (such as Spycraft 1.0, a D20 STL -- not OGL -- game) could bring in non-D&D players and encourage them to 'buy in'. But the GSL is so tightly written that I don't see much being produced that isn't of interest solely to currently active players. I could be wrong, of course, and we'll see what surprises come about...)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lizard, post: 4324393, member: 1054"] (From another thread) It's really, really, hard not to keep coming round to "WOTC felt somehow obliged to produce a license, but really doesn't know what they want from third parties". Dancey's vision was clear: He wanted D20 Uber Alles. He wanted to encourage every company to buy into the D20 system and spread it throughout gaming. One die to rule them all. The OGC/PI split was there to encourage companies to produce valuable IP (settings, backgrounds, fluff) without fear of it being "stolen", while keeping all mechanics open so that they system could grow. It might not have worked out perfectly, but the "vision" was clear. I don't know what WOTCs "vision" is for the GSL. So I'm asking: What does WOTC want/expect from the GSL? We had a lot of essays from Ryan Dancey about what he expected, what he believed, what motivated him, what his philosophy was, what his influences were, and so on. We haven't seen anything like that from WOTC this time around. We have the license itself, and, on the surface, the "vision" we get from the actual text is "We're not really comfortable with this whole concept". However, if they were really the case, there wouldn't BE a license, so, I have to assume that the license isn't the entirety of the "vision". I'd like to know what the purpose, goals, etc of the license is. ("Sell more PHBs" doesn't cut it. With the license as written, it's hard to imagine any produce for it which wouldn't sell only to people already active in D&D. Under the OGL, a cool setting (such as Freeport) or a cool variant (such as Spycraft 1.0, a D20 STL -- not OGL -- game) could bring in non-D&D players and encourage them to 'buy in'. But the GSL is so tightly written that I don't see much being produced that isn't of interest solely to currently active players. I could be wrong, of course, and we'll see what surprises come about...) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is WOTC's Vision For The GSL?
Top