Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is WOTC's Vision For The GSL?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phloog" data-source="post: 4331932" data-attributes="member: 59219"><p>This thread has got me imagining scenarios, and I'm thinking about this one right now:</p><p></p><p>Most of these assumptions could be bogus, but here goes for discussion.</p><p></p><p>Assume: There are still those individuals who believe/know that having some form of openness benefits WOTC in the form of maintaining a large customer base.</p><p></p><p>Known: Companies MUST take action in the best interest of the shareholders, and cannot take actions which could in any way harm the stock value.</p><p></p><p>Belief: 'Harming Stock Value' is so loosely defined as to frighten most company leadership out of doing anything that could in any way be interpreted/accused of harming value.</p><p></p><p>Belief: Sales of products for any given rule set will decline as customers grow weary (or some other effect) near the end of the 'lifespan' of that product.</p><p></p><p>Doesn't this mean that the instant a product from a non-WOTC publisher sells more than a WOTC product of a similar type, there will be a huge push internally to zap the GSL?</p><p></p><p>More interestingly, doesn't this suggest that in the future we may see a situation where, near the end of 4E, WOTC becomes mysteriously far more lenient in terms of what they allow, so that they can begin spending less on 4E in preparation for 5E?</p><p></p><p>And would this mean that for all the justifiable concern/fear about the GSL in these early days, the real problem will not happen until the end of 4E, when they use the GSL mutability to not tighten restrictions, but to loosen them, then snap it shut completely (total revocation) for 5E, causing tons of products to have to be scrapped and all to be forced to go to 5E?</p><p></p><p>This is, as always, not an accusation of evil or unethical behavior by Hasbro/WOTC, but perhaps it is just a natural result of this setup...at the end they will need to spend less on 4e to ramp up 5E, but the proper business move is to open up to others to allow continued 4e support/customer base. Then the next proper business move for 5E would be to destroy all support for 4E immediately - something I'm sure they would have loved to do for 3E, but couldn't due to the nature of OGL.</p><p></p><p>Maybe 3pps should be worried now, but more worried with each passing month.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phloog, post: 4331932, member: 59219"] This thread has got me imagining scenarios, and I'm thinking about this one right now: Most of these assumptions could be bogus, but here goes for discussion. Assume: There are still those individuals who believe/know that having some form of openness benefits WOTC in the form of maintaining a large customer base. Known: Companies MUST take action in the best interest of the shareholders, and cannot take actions which could in any way harm the stock value. Belief: 'Harming Stock Value' is so loosely defined as to frighten most company leadership out of doing anything that could in any way be interpreted/accused of harming value. Belief: Sales of products for any given rule set will decline as customers grow weary (or some other effect) near the end of the 'lifespan' of that product. Doesn't this mean that the instant a product from a non-WOTC publisher sells more than a WOTC product of a similar type, there will be a huge push internally to zap the GSL? More interestingly, doesn't this suggest that in the future we may see a situation where, near the end of 4E, WOTC becomes mysteriously far more lenient in terms of what they allow, so that they can begin spending less on 4E in preparation for 5E? And would this mean that for all the justifiable concern/fear about the GSL in these early days, the real problem will not happen until the end of 4E, when they use the GSL mutability to not tighten restrictions, but to loosen them, then snap it shut completely (total revocation) for 5E, causing tons of products to have to be scrapped and all to be forced to go to 5E? This is, as always, not an accusation of evil or unethical behavior by Hasbro/WOTC, but perhaps it is just a natural result of this setup...at the end they will need to spend less on 4e to ramp up 5E, but the proper business move is to open up to others to allow continued 4e support/customer base. Then the next proper business move for 5E would be to destroy all support for 4E immediately - something I'm sure they would have loved to do for 3E, but couldn't due to the nature of OGL. Maybe 3pps should be worried now, but more worried with each passing month. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is WOTC's Vision For The GSL?
Top