Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RFisher" data-source="post: 3255600" data-attributes="member: 3608">
<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Well, that's level limits, not class limits.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">He could still gain XP, he just didn't gain levels.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Do you know exactly when &amp; exactly why your abilities reach a plateau? Just because a PC reaches his maximum potential, that doesn't mean he knows he is level X.</li>
</ul>Until you got to that last sentence, I disagree. You don't need mechanical advancement for the game to be fun. Mechanical advancement can be fun, but it isn't essential.But when your character can't advance while his associates can--yeah, that can be annoying. I don't know that I'd call it &quot;about the most anti-fun development imaginable&quot;, but I can agree with anti-fun.The constant trend of extending the level limits is--to me--a clear indication that they were a bit of a kludge.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RFisher, post: 3255600, member: 3608"] [list] [*]Well, that's [i]level[/i] limits, not [i]class[/i] limits. [*]He [i]could[/i] still gain XP, he just didn't gain levels. [*]Do [i]you[/i] know exactly when & exactly why [i]your[/i] abilities reach a plateau? Just because a PC reaches his maximum potential, that doesn't mean he knows he is level X. [/list] Until you got to that last sentence, I disagree. You don't need mechanical advancement for the game to be fun. Mechanical advancement [i]can[/i] be fun, but it isn't essential. But when your character can't advance while his associates can--yeah, that can be annoying. I don't know that I'd call it "about the most anti-fun development imaginable", but I can agree with anti-fun. The constant trend of extending the level limits is--to me--a clear indication that they were a bit of a kludge. [/QUOTE]

Verification