Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is wrong with race class limits?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quasqueton" data-source="post: 3256363" data-attributes="member: 3854"><p>First: In my AD&D1 campaigns, I never had a problem with race/class restrictions or race/class level limits. I accepted the rules as they were and never thought about how they affected game balance. The issue just rarely came up. Only a couple (that I can remember off hand) PCs ever rose above ~7th level from low level.</p><p></p><p>But now that I understand “game balance”, and have seen and played with more Players, I see how the restrictions and limits were bad mechanics <em>for balance</em>.</p><p></p><p>I had one Player tell me once, straight-honest, that he was going to play a demi-human because my campaigns never got high level. Another Player admitted that he always played elves in my games because my campaigns never got high level. I suspect another Player of always playing elves for this reason.</p><p></p><p>If a DM’s campaign did regularly reach high levels, then the Players either had to play humans, or someone would find the enjoyment of the game lessened when they stayed 9th level while the other party members were reaching 15th. For classes like the fighter and thief, the difference between 9th and 15th level was not that great (you stop getting hit points at ~9th level). But for classes like clerics and magic-users, the difference between 9th and 15th level was astronomical (5th level spells versus 8th level spells). And imagine the difference between a 15th-level magic-user and a 9th-level fighter in a party together.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Imagine you and your friends have motorcycles, and you go joy riding every weekend. Your friends’ cycles have chopper front wheels, big flaming pipes, all kinds of cool accessories that make the riding experience more fun than just riding your stock bike. For the same price tag of their fancy rides, you got a 20-gallon fuel tank. But if your joy riding never burns more than 7 gallons of fuel (within the range of all your friends bikes), your bike isn’t noticeably cooler than a stock bike. Sure, you can have plenty of fun on a stock bike, but you got to admit, chopper wheels and flaming pipes are cool to have.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Special abilities, bonuses, and “gimmicks” for demi-humans often made PCs more fun to play (for some people). And if the only [major] mechanical drawback of the race rarely came into play, well, it didn’t really matter. That is what is wrong with AD&D race/class restrictions and level limits.</p><p></p><p>Also, there was a measure of intra-party competition for personal power in some games. [Even Gary Gygax had/has this – he refuses, even to this day, to give out any of his personal characters’ actual game stats because of this sense of competition. He doesn’t want other Players to have knowledge of his PCs’ abilities and weaknesses. (He has stated so on this forum*.)] So, for some Players, in a game that will probably stay at low to mid levels, the demi-human special abilities made their characters more powerful than the “suckers” who stuck with humans, whose only “bonus” was unlimited advancement.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Compare the 20-gallon fuel tank to higher speed, better maneuverability, or lighter weight. To the competitive biker, a longer range is worthless for short distance riding.</p><p></p><p>Quasqueton</p><p></p><p>* <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=2922198&postcount=71" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=2922198&postcount=71</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quasqueton, post: 3256363, member: 3854"] First: In my AD&D1 campaigns, I never had a problem with race/class restrictions or race/class level limits. I accepted the rules as they were and never thought about how they affected game balance. The issue just rarely came up. Only a couple (that I can remember off hand) PCs ever rose above ~7th level from low level. But now that I understand “game balance”, and have seen and played with more Players, I see how the restrictions and limits were bad mechanics [i]for balance[/i]. I had one Player tell me once, straight-honest, that he was going to play a demi-human because my campaigns never got high level. Another Player admitted that he always played elves in my games because my campaigns never got high level. I suspect another Player of always playing elves for this reason. If a DM’s campaign did regularly reach high levels, then the Players either had to play humans, or someone would find the enjoyment of the game lessened when they stayed 9th level while the other party members were reaching 15th. For classes like the fighter and thief, the difference between 9th and 15th level was not that great (you stop getting hit points at ~9th level). But for classes like clerics and magic-users, the difference between 9th and 15th level was astronomical (5th level spells versus 8th level spells). And imagine the difference between a 15th-level magic-user and a 9th-level fighter in a party together. Imagine you and your friends have motorcycles, and you go joy riding every weekend. Your friends’ cycles have chopper front wheels, big flaming pipes, all kinds of cool accessories that make the riding experience more fun than just riding your stock bike. For the same price tag of their fancy rides, you got a 20-gallon fuel tank. But if your joy riding never burns more than 7 gallons of fuel (within the range of all your friends bikes), your bike isn’t noticeably cooler than a stock bike. Sure, you can have plenty of fun on a stock bike, but you got to admit, chopper wheels and flaming pipes are cool to have. Special abilities, bonuses, and “gimmicks” for demi-humans often made PCs more fun to play (for some people). And if the only [major] mechanical drawback of the race rarely came into play, well, it didn’t really matter. That is what is wrong with AD&D race/class restrictions and level limits. Also, there was a measure of intra-party competition for personal power in some games. [Even Gary Gygax had/has this – he refuses, even to this day, to give out any of his personal characters’ actual game stats because of this sense of competition. He doesn’t want other Players to have knowledge of his PCs’ abilities and weaknesses. (He has stated so on this forum*.)] So, for some Players, in a game that will probably stay at low to mid levels, the demi-human special abilities made their characters more powerful than the “suckers” who stuck with humans, whose only “bonus” was unlimited advancement. Compare the 20-gallon fuel tank to higher speed, better maneuverability, or lighter weight. To the competitive biker, a longer range is worthless for short distance riding. Quasqueton * [url]http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=2922198&postcount=71[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is wrong with race class limits?
Top