Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is wrong with race class limits?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PapersAndPaychecks" data-source="post: 3262066" data-attributes="member: 28854"><p>Sure it does. If you play the game as written.</p><p></p><p>The issue is that the "game as written" assumes conditions as they were in the mid-1970's, i.e., you play the game straight through from 1st level to level 14+, and the DM's campaign stays static (when you roll a new character, it's in the same world as the old), and each player has a main character and multiple henchmen (so if your main character dies and can't be rezzed or whatever, you can take over the hench instead of starting again at level 1), and there are 8-12 players who compete with each other rather than always co-operating... and the <strong>big</strong> assumption which is that everyone's a wargamer who wants to "win," and making their choices with an eye to having the most powerful character later in the game.</p><p></p><p>These are the players who forced Gygax etc. to come up with the alignment mechanism because without it, there was too much acting Chaotic Selfish. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> D&D's the only game that's ever <em>needed</em> an alignment system (which is why it surprises me that alignment wasn't one of the sacred cows that 3e sacrificed).</p><p></p><p>Most of those players would go with humans because they're destined to be the ultimate "winners" of D&D. (We didn't get the "you can't win at a RPG" thing at all!)</p><p></p><p>I remember sitting round with my fellow players earnestly figuring out the optimal party for us (which was 5 fighters, 3 clerics, 3 mages and a thief, iirc) and needing to roll the dice to decide who would have to play the elf and who would have to play the dwarf. Because you <em>needed</em> one of each in the party; the elf spotted the secret doors and fought the ghouls, and the dwarf had the extra detect traps thing and the incredibly good saving throws and the huge AC bonus against ogres and giants...</p><p></p><p>If you play the game as if it were 3e -- i.e. with about 4 or 5 players, one character each and that character representing the player's entire investment in the game, no henchmen, people regularly dropping old campaigns and starting new ones to experiment with different settings or because the old campaign was just boring, then no, the mechanic isn't going to work for you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PapersAndPaychecks, post: 3262066, member: 28854"] Sure it does. If you play the game as written. The issue is that the "game as written" assumes conditions as they were in the mid-1970's, i.e., you play the game straight through from 1st level to level 14+, and the DM's campaign stays static (when you roll a new character, it's in the same world as the old), and each player has a main character and multiple henchmen (so if your main character dies and can't be rezzed or whatever, you can take over the hench instead of starting again at level 1), and there are 8-12 players who compete with each other rather than always co-operating... and the [b]big[/b] assumption which is that everyone's a wargamer who wants to "win," and making their choices with an eye to having the most powerful character later in the game. These are the players who forced Gygax etc. to come up with the alignment mechanism because without it, there was too much acting Chaotic Selfish. ;) D&D's the only game that's ever [i]needed[/i] an alignment system (which is why it surprises me that alignment wasn't one of the sacred cows that 3e sacrificed). Most of those players would go with humans because they're destined to be the ultimate "winners" of D&D. (We didn't get the "you can't win at a RPG" thing at all!) I remember sitting round with my fellow players earnestly figuring out the optimal party for us (which was 5 fighters, 3 clerics, 3 mages and a thief, iirc) and needing to roll the dice to decide who would have to play the elf and who would have to play the dwarf. Because you [i]needed[/i] one of each in the party; the elf spotted the secret doors and fought the ghouls, and the dwarf had the extra detect traps thing and the incredibly good saving throws and the huge AC bonus against ogres and giants... If you play the game as if it were 3e -- i.e. with about 4 or 5 players, one character each and that character representing the player's entire investment in the game, no henchmen, people regularly dropping old campaigns and starting new ones to experiment with different settings or because the old campaign was just boring, then no, the mechanic isn't going to work for you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What is wrong with race class limits?
Top