Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kaleon Moonshae" data-source="post: 1631809" data-attributes="member: 12147">I have problems with questions like this, mainly because I have an eastern view of morality as discussed on another thread. I have no desire to be called &quot;good&quot; and it doesn't bother me if I am called &quot;evil&quot; because I do not believe either of those things exist. The closest I have found int he west is Moorcock's moral system. So with all of those things said and being forced to fit myself into the 3.5 alignment system, I am chaotic-neutral with evil tendencies.Chaotic: I have my own code of conduct but it isn't set in stone, I will deviate if I need to. I do not like draconic laws myself and break more than a few.Neutral: I judge my actions on personal relationships and the balance of keeping things natural. I don't really see evil or good as the right way to go all the time and I believe much more in composure, humilty and tao.Evil: I'll b ehonest here, I have no compunction with killing, we are all animals and we have no more inbred rights than they do. If I need to protect myself or others, or if I just think me or mine would be enough better off without someone, I can see killing that person, but I do believe in have ramifications to such actions and am willing to do the time if I do the crime.so it's a hard choice for me, but I do not believe in altruism, and personally do not believe it exists as anything but the biologically defined dna process that I learned about in college concerning bees. We do good acts because we expect something in return, even if it is just a good feeling.my two cents, let the flames comence.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kaleon Moonshae, post: 1631809, member: 12147"] I have problems with questions like this, mainly because I have an eastern view of morality as discussed on another thread. I have no desire to be called "good" and it doesn't bother me if I am called "evil" because I do not believe either of those things exist. The closest I have found int he west is Moorcock's moral system. So with all of those things said and being forced to fit myself into the 3.5 alignment system, I am chaotic-neutral with evil tendencies. Chaotic: I have my own code of conduct but it isn't set in stone, I will deviate if I need to. I do not like draconic laws myself and break more than a few. Neutral: I judge my actions on personal relationships and the balance of keeping things natural. I don't really see evil or good as the right way to go all the time and I believe much more in composure, humilty and tao. Evil: I'll b ehonest here, I have no compunction with killing, we are all animals and we have no more inbred rights than they do. If I need to protect myself or others, or if I just think me or mine would be enough better off without someone, I can see killing that person, but I do believe in have ramifications to such actions and am willing to do the time if I do the crime. so it's a hard choice for me, but I do not believe in altruism, and personally do not believe it exists as anything but the biologically defined dna process that I learned about in college concerning bees. We do good acts because we expect something in return, even if it is just a good feeling. my two cents, let the flames comence. [/QUOTE]

Verification