Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jacob Lewis" data-source="post: 7541597" data-attributes="member: 6667921">@<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=23751" target="_blank">Maxperson</a> You seem to come to a lot of wrong conclusions and assumptions from everything I write, so I'm not sure it is worth my time and effort continuously trying to correct you. I am not advocating one play style over another. I don't believe I would enjoy a purely combat-centric campaign. I much prefer roleplaying with like-minded players, but also enjoy some hack-n-slash fun with friends who enjoy that more.What I am advocating in this thread is for players to have their choice and not be criticized or shamed because the bulk of unthinking people who think the majority must be right. D&D has always been more focused on the combat and encounters, this edition is no exception. To its credit, it has increased some emphasis on the other pillars, which have always existed in every edition. But those areas have largely been left to individual groups to handle themselves. So if I, or anyone else, feels that combat options are more interesting or combat has more representations in a campaign, we should not be made to defend our personal preferences. Play as you like. Let others play their way, too.</blockquote>