Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7541909" data-attributes="member: 6919838">The thing is this and I think [MENTION=23751]Maxperson[/MENTION] is inclined to agree with this...In play are there &quot;solutions&quot; and paths to achieve the goals and objectives (whether these problems or goals/objectives come from GM quests or PCs preferences - no matter) that rely on, require and/or benefit from explore, social and combat pillars or are these strongly biased to only feature one with the other two as fillers?That is a campaign defining &quot;balance that is absolutely in the GM hands to most extent but driven by player choices as well and it is **not** really set by the rules or the page counts of rules in one book or another. The only case IMO for &quot;combat pillar&quot; import as system-defined top doggie would be a GM only giving xp for killing monsters by the rules and ignored all the other xp options - which is kind of within the rules but basically applying them rather myopically.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7541909, member: 6919838"] The thing is this and I think [MENTION=23751]Maxperson[/MENTION] is inclined to agree with this... In play are there "solutions" and paths to achieve the goals and objectives (whether these problems or goals/objectives come from GM quests or PCs preferences - no matter) that rely on, require and/or benefit from explore, social and combat pillars or are these strongly biased to only feature one with the other two as fillers? That is a campaign defining "balance that is absolutely in the GM hands to most extent but driven by player choices as well and it is **not** really set by the rules or the page counts of rules in one book or another. The only case IMO for "combat pillar" import as system-defined top doggie would be a GM only giving xp for killing monsters by the rules and ignored all the other xp options - which is kind of within the rules but basically applying them rather myopically. [/QUOTE]

Verification