Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What is your character's AC at 20th level with no enhancements?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2809653" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Although the Great Wyrm Gold Dragon does not need to worry about disarms, sunders, trips, or grapples.</p><p></p><p>He does have to worry about touch spells/powers, some of which have no saves and/or no SR.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Does the DM just automatically assume that:</p><p></p><p>1) The opponent knows what Combat Expertise is (if he does not have the feat).</p><p>2) The opponent knows that Combat Expertise lowers your ability to protect against certain attack forms.</p><p>3) The opponent knows that you are actually using Combat Expertise.</p><p></p><p>There should minimally be a Spot check to see that Combat Expertise is being used and an Int check (if the opponent does not have the feat) in there somewhere to know all of this, instead of auto-knowledge by a "smart opponent".</p><p></p><p>Personally as a DM, I would not let my players know that an NPC is using Combat Expertise. I would just let them know if they hit the NPC's AC or not. It's up to the player to figure out how to take advantage of a hard to hit NPC.</p><p></p><p>With regard to NPCs, most NPCs would just use their normal attack modes and might after a few rounds of having a tough time of hitting a PC, switch over to other attack modes if the normal one is failing. But, they would only do this if they were skilled in a non-standard attack (had the Improved Sunder feat for example).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2809653, member: 2011"] Although the Great Wyrm Gold Dragon does not need to worry about disarms, sunders, trips, or grapples. He does have to worry about touch spells/powers, some of which have no saves and/or no SR. Does the DM just automatically assume that: 1) The opponent knows what Combat Expertise is (if he does not have the feat). 2) The opponent knows that Combat Expertise lowers your ability to protect against certain attack forms. 3) The opponent knows that you are actually using Combat Expertise. There should minimally be a Spot check to see that Combat Expertise is being used and an Int check (if the opponent does not have the feat) in there somewhere to know all of this, instead of auto-knowledge by a "smart opponent". Personally as a DM, I would not let my players know that an NPC is using Combat Expertise. I would just let them know if they hit the NPC's AC or not. It's up to the player to figure out how to take advantage of a hard to hit NPC. With regard to NPCs, most NPCs would just use their normal attack modes and might after a few rounds of having a tough time of hitting a PC, switch over to other attack modes if the normal one is failing. But, they would only do this if they were skilled in a non-standard attack (had the Improved Sunder feat for example). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What is your character's AC at 20th level with no enhancements?
Top