Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What is your character's AC at 20th level with no enhancements?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2811101" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Stating this for Total Defense would be fairly redundant since the NPC does not attack that round during his init. It could be a little misleading to a player if the player was not paying attention and did not notice that the NPC did not attack.</p><p></p><p>Stating this for Fighting Defensively would be virtually identical as stating it for Combat Expertise. You are telling the players straight up that the opponent is lowering his offensive capability. Ditto for giving hints about the power of a given blow with Power Attack, etc.</p><p></p><p>Stating this for Dodge is intentionally misleading the player. You are implying that the NPC is either using Combat Expertise or Fighting Defensively (or both) which could easily mislead a player into using an alternative attack form. As a DM, I find it preferable to not play these types of mind games on my players since it is not fun for anyone.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Could you please tell us what page this is on in the DMG?</p><p></p><p>I cannot find it in my copy of the DMG.</p><p></p><p>I can find on page 26 where it states to describe a combat result with a "good visual description". And there is also a section on visually describing critical hits on that page.</p><p></p><p>But, this is not the same as giving hints to your players as to which combat maneuvers and feats the NPCs are using. It's adding flavor text.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2811101, member: 2011"] Stating this for Total Defense would be fairly redundant since the NPC does not attack that round during his init. It could be a little misleading to a player if the player was not paying attention and did not notice that the NPC did not attack. Stating this for Fighting Defensively would be virtually identical as stating it for Combat Expertise. You are telling the players straight up that the opponent is lowering his offensive capability. Ditto for giving hints about the power of a given blow with Power Attack, etc. Stating this for Dodge is intentionally misleading the player. You are implying that the NPC is either using Combat Expertise or Fighting Defensively (or both) which could easily mislead a player into using an alternative attack form. As a DM, I find it preferable to not play these types of mind games on my players since it is not fun for anyone. Could you please tell us what page this is on in the DMG? I cannot find it in my copy of the DMG. I can find on page 26 where it states to describe a combat result with a "good visual description". And there is also a section on visually describing critical hits on that page. But, this is not the same as giving hints to your players as to which combat maneuvers and feats the NPCs are using. It's adding flavor text. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What is your character's AC at 20th level with no enhancements?
Top