Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blizzardb" data-source="post: 4828425" data-attributes="member: 60680">I am very impressed by the way they handled the Wizard in 4E and love my Wizard character. I am still very surprised that many people think he is underpowered or boring. And yes, they should balance the orb build.My other favorites are the sorcerer, fighter, shaman, barbarian, and avengerI don't particulary like the bard and the invoker - the bard is very different than the stereotype in my head and the invoker invokes the thought &quot;we should have a divine controller even if we have no good idea for him&quot;. And I don't like the warlock very much - he feels kinda bland and his class mechanics aren't appealing to me (I had a blast playing a warlock in 3.5, though).Edit: An important addendum - every class in 4E is appealing to me to some degree and I would gladly create a character even from the classes that I don't like very much.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blizzardb, post: 4828425, member: 60680"] I am very impressed by the way they handled the Wizard in 4E and love my Wizard character. I am still very surprised that many people think he is underpowered or boring. And yes, they should balance the orb build. My other favorites are the sorcerer, fighter, shaman, barbarian, and avenger I don't particulary like the bard and the invoker - the bard is very different than the stereotype in my head and the invoker invokes the thought "we should have a divine controller even if we have no good idea for him". And I don't like the warlock very much - he feels kinda bland and his class mechanics aren't appealing to me (I had a blast playing a warlock in 3.5, though). Edit: An important addendum - every class in 4E is appealing to me to some degree and I would gladly create a character even from the classes that I don't like very much. [/QUOTE]

Verification