Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lakesidefantasy" data-source="post: 8425733" data-attributes="member: 6682043">I always thought of the sorcerer as an experimental wizard class, and I expected it to replace the wizard. I saw it as an attempt to make the wizard easier and more fun to play because it was always so annoying to decide each 'morning' on what spells to prepare for the day. It was so annoying that when I played a wizard I always prepared a generic list of spells and never returned to the question. In that way, I was playing a de facto sorcerer. I'm wrong of course, which I'm sure will quickly be pointed out in a slightly degrading and subtly devastating fashion.  <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🙃" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f643.png" title="Upside-down face    :upside_down:" data-shortname=":upside_down:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></blockquote>