Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 9408238" data-attributes="member: 59057">I did not state it as fact.Nope. You really mix up logic with wild guessing.Impossible, because we don't have WotC's  data and methods.* I also don't say they are infalliable.I tried. But there is really nothing in it that makes sense. You make claims that are probably untrue (you might be right, but we don't know, but it is unlilely).So please stop making accusations you cannot prove. This is how conspiracy theories work: stating things without fact, making "logical" conclusions about things that are not easy to prove without insight in certain things. They also reverse the bruden of proof. We really have enough of that already.*what we know is that polling is more complex than many people think. Especially in a poll where mostly those interested in a certain outcome take part. So there are a lot of biases in play. You might look up at least a summary of them. There you might find one possible reason why the treshold of satisfactory rating is 70%, not 50%.</blockquote>