Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What It's Like For a Gamer Girl
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kahuna Burger" data-source="post: 1072886" data-attributes="member: 8439"><p>Well, now that we've demonstrated the overwhellming guy think that EN world is based on... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> </p><p></p><p>Moving this part up...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The only problem with this theory is that there an assumption (underlying most of your responses, IMHO) that in the social sphere its the women who have to adjust their behaviour to be one of the guys. Men only need to read the book to "handle" that special woman or two in their lives, but women need to learn how to act the right way to get into society. </p><p></p><p>The problem isn't that men and women behave or react differently. The problem (demonstrated very well on this thread) is when either men or women (usually men due to their dominance of our culture) decide that their way is somehow intrinsicly RIGHT and the other side should just get used to it, toughen up, learn to be the same, etc etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In a word, **CENSORED**. The fact that guys may be used to playing with guys does not in any way mean that women have to become guys to play. It doesn't mean that guy think dynamic is good for the game or essential to the way it is played. What you can do about it is be youself as a gamer and make it clear that the things that make a "gamer" are not the things that make a "guy". </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>true, once you accept the guy definitions of emotions - that is that anger is not "emotional". If my printer jams up when I'm on a deadline and I shed a tear thats "emotional" to a guy. When his printer jms up and he lets loose a string of obscinities and swears he's gonna throw it out the window, that generally isn't. (note, this comes from a long multimember conversation on USENET years ago (which I only observed) in which the males on the group would contort themselves amazingly to show that anger was "better" than sadness as a response to stress.) The fact that guys express their emotions/stress differently from women isn't a problem - But the guy think comes in when women learn the differences and men just continue to say "women are emotional, guys aren't".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>and when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail... Guys who get too hung up on problem solving become problem creators. The idea that any situation has "the solution" out there is part of the problem, not an excuse for it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>see above. men and women are equally emotional, and feelings (ego, dominance, need to prove themselves) are just as laced into male responses as women. But the responses come out differently. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, it's an emotional response. Its ego, pure and simple. Couching it as a vital survival trait is all well and good, certainly makes it seem like something everyone should be doing, but its not. Its just one of the emotional responses guys have. Since its a lot easier for guys to continue on their way interacting only with enshrined guy think it rarely gets challenged, but when it has been challenged, men are just as capable as women of overcoming their instinctive/early socialized response and making a more useful response. Though not, obviously, if when confronted with it they simply respond "cause thats the way men are and its the right way, if I didn't act this way right now you womenfolk would have gotten eaten by a sabertooth tiger back when..."</p><p></p><p>This isn't a man woman thing, its a dominate culture/dominated culture thing. But the overall culture improves when the exchange of attitudes goes both ways. There is nothing instrinsic to RPGs that requires guy think. If your particular social/rpg group is deeply entreched to the point where you will only accept guys and "guys with breasts" thats one thing, but its not the way rpging is, its just the way you are. </p><p></p><p>So to the orriginal questions, yes a lot of these are "guy behavious". But when they are so completely entrenched and unwilling to adjust, they become "jerk behaviours". Guys who are not jerks may still have some of these behavious compared to women who have not been guyed, but they have learned to be gamers first. When looking for a new group, I'd look for one that already has woman members (who aren't ashamed of being women) and/or know some of the guys socially first so you can get a feel for how well socialized they are with mixed gender interaction. Though the best strategy for me has just been to form the group myself and make it clear from the outset what behaviours I will and won't tolerate.</p><p></p><p>we now return you to your regularly scheduled testosterone love fest....</p><p></p><p>Kahuna burger</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kahuna Burger, post: 1072886, member: 8439"] Well, now that we've demonstrated the overwhellming guy think that EN world is based on... :( Moving this part up... The only problem with this theory is that there an assumption (underlying most of your responses, IMHO) that in the social sphere its the women who have to adjust their behaviour to be one of the guys. Men only need to read the book to "handle" that special woman or two in their lives, but women need to learn how to act the right way to get into society. The problem isn't that men and women behave or react differently. The problem (demonstrated very well on this thread) is when either men or women (usually men due to their dominance of our culture) decide that their way is somehow intrinsicly RIGHT and the other side should just get used to it, toughen up, learn to be the same, etc etc. [B][/b] In a word, **CENSORED**. The fact that guys may be used to playing with guys does not in any way mean that women have to become guys to play. It doesn't mean that guy think dynamic is good for the game or essential to the way it is played. What you can do about it is be youself as a gamer and make it clear that the things that make a "gamer" are not the things that make a "guy". [b][/b] true, once you accept the guy definitions of emotions - that is that anger is not "emotional". If my printer jams up when I'm on a deadline and I shed a tear thats "emotional" to a guy. When his printer jms up and he lets loose a string of obscinities and swears he's gonna throw it out the window, that generally isn't. (note, this comes from a long multimember conversation on USENET years ago (which I only observed) in which the males on the group would contort themselves amazingly to show that anger was "better" than sadness as a response to stress.) The fact that guys express their emotions/stress differently from women isn't a problem - But the guy think comes in when women learn the differences and men just continue to say "women are emotional, guys aren't". [b][/b] and when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail... Guys who get too hung up on problem solving become problem creators. The idea that any situation has "the solution" out there is part of the problem, not an excuse for it. see above. men and women are equally emotional, and feelings (ego, dominance, need to prove themselves) are just as laced into male responses as women. But the responses come out differently. Again, it's an emotional response. Its ego, pure and simple. Couching it as a vital survival trait is all well and good, certainly makes it seem like something everyone should be doing, but its not. Its just one of the emotional responses guys have. Since its a lot easier for guys to continue on their way interacting only with enshrined guy think it rarely gets challenged, but when it has been challenged, men are just as capable as women of overcoming their instinctive/early socialized response and making a more useful response. Though not, obviously, if when confronted with it they simply respond "cause thats the way men are and its the right way, if I didn't act this way right now you womenfolk would have gotten eaten by a sabertooth tiger back when..." This isn't a man woman thing, its a dominate culture/dominated culture thing. But the overall culture improves when the exchange of attitudes goes both ways. There is nothing instrinsic to RPGs that requires guy think. If your particular social/rpg group is deeply entreched to the point where you will only accept guys and "guys with breasts" thats one thing, but its not the way rpging is, its just the way you are. So to the orriginal questions, yes a lot of these are "guy behavious". But when they are so completely entrenched and unwilling to adjust, they become "jerk behaviours". Guys who are not jerks may still have some of these behavious compared to women who have not been guyed, but they have learned to be gamers first. When looking for a new group, I'd look for one that already has woman members (who aren't ashamed of being women) and/or know some of the guys socially first so you can get a feel for how well socialized they are with mixed gender interaction. Though the best strategy for me has just been to form the group myself and make it clear from the outset what behaviours I will and won't tolerate. we now return you to your regularly scheduled testosterone love fest.... Kahuna burger [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What It's Like For a Gamer Girl
Top