Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What It's Like For a Gamer Girl
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 1073135" data-attributes="member: 7240"><p>Kahuna Burger makes a series of criticisms of behaviour as objectively bad in all situations; while her criticisms might be appropriate for behaviour in the public sphere, in public institutions, they have no place in the world of D&D.</p><p></p><p>Each D&D group is its own miniature discourse community. The nature of that community is based not on some set of absolute social standards but on the standards the DM and players collectively develop. Afrodyte is operating in a discourse community with a different set of standards; because this group is not a trade union, political party, church or other public institutions, it has no obligation whatsoever to adapt its standards to mainstream society's. </p><p></p><p>I was in a poker game for several years in which sexist, racist and homophobic remarks were very much the order of the day. Most of the players were friends of mine who were perfectly enjoyable company outside of the poker game. My reaction to this was not to demand that these people's behaviour conform to the norms of society so that I could feel comfortable; my response was to leave the game because I didn't fit in and playing poker with these people made the rest of my friendship with them less fun. </p><p></p><p>If a group dynamic is not to your liking, it is pointless to find it "objectively bad" and rail against it. The solution is to spend your time in a group dynamic that is more to your liking. It is not okay for us to encourage Afrodyte to stay in the group and try to change it because she is somehow objectively right. That course of action will make it less fun for the players in that group who will, in turn, make it less fun for Afrodyte. This gaming circle is not the Little Rock public school system -- there's no public issue here. It's just a bunch of guys who want to get together once a week and be who they feel like being. </p><p></p><p>Kahuna Burger's comments only make sense if D&D games are somehow re-classified into the public sphere. While her comments might make sense if we were talking about weekly meetings of a political party, or executive meetings of the Chamber of Commerce, they have absolutely no place in discussing voluntary, non-exclusive, private, recreational associations. The state doesn't register D&D games; D&D games don't charge membership fees; we don't all get annual licenses from the national D&D players' association. The same bill of rights which promises freedom from discrimination also promises freedom of assembly and association.</p><p></p><p>It is destructive for us to suggest that Afrodyte hang in there because she is "right"; she should be spending her energies creating a better, different gaming group that is actually fun. I would recommend one that has a higher female to male ratio so that the social dynamic that is created is more neutral and woman-friendly -- not because it's objectively better but based on the vastly more important criterion that <strong>it would be more fun for her</strong>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fusangite, post: 1073135, member: 7240"] Kahuna Burger makes a series of criticisms of behaviour as objectively bad in all situations; while her criticisms might be appropriate for behaviour in the public sphere, in public institutions, they have no place in the world of D&D. Each D&D group is its own miniature discourse community. The nature of that community is based not on some set of absolute social standards but on the standards the DM and players collectively develop. Afrodyte is operating in a discourse community with a different set of standards; because this group is not a trade union, political party, church or other public institutions, it has no obligation whatsoever to adapt its standards to mainstream society's. I was in a poker game for several years in which sexist, racist and homophobic remarks were very much the order of the day. Most of the players were friends of mine who were perfectly enjoyable company outside of the poker game. My reaction to this was not to demand that these people's behaviour conform to the norms of society so that I could feel comfortable; my response was to leave the game because I didn't fit in and playing poker with these people made the rest of my friendship with them less fun. If a group dynamic is not to your liking, it is pointless to find it "objectively bad" and rail against it. The solution is to spend your time in a group dynamic that is more to your liking. It is not okay for us to encourage Afrodyte to stay in the group and try to change it because she is somehow objectively right. That course of action will make it less fun for the players in that group who will, in turn, make it less fun for Afrodyte. This gaming circle is not the Little Rock public school system -- there's no public issue here. It's just a bunch of guys who want to get together once a week and be who they feel like being. Kahuna Burger's comments only make sense if D&D games are somehow re-classified into the public sphere. While her comments might make sense if we were talking about weekly meetings of a political party, or executive meetings of the Chamber of Commerce, they have absolutely no place in discussing voluntary, non-exclusive, private, recreational associations. The state doesn't register D&D games; D&D games don't charge membership fees; we don't all get annual licenses from the national D&D players' association. The same bill of rights which promises freedom from discrimination also promises freedom of assembly and association. It is destructive for us to suggest that Afrodyte hang in there because she is "right"; she should be spending her energies creating a better, different gaming group that is actually fun. I would recommend one that has a higher female to male ratio so that the social dynamic that is created is more neutral and woman-friendly -- not because it's objectively better but based on the vastly more important criterion that [b]it would be more fun for her[/b]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What It's Like For a Gamer Girl
Top