Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lakesidefantasy" data-source="post: 8453107" data-attributes="member: 6682043">I would like a few base classes (fighter, rogue, wizard) with more restricted subclasses as an option. Meaning, I could play a basic fighter and build it any way I choose, or I could play a fighter-paladin with many of the build choices made for me. On top of all of that I would like optional archetypes that further divide each class and subclass into specialized things like fighter-paladin-oath of vengeance.I want options. Paradoxically I want the option to have less options, similar to the way feats and multiclassing are handled. Currently feats and multiclassing are optional additions to the game. I would like subclasses and archetypes to be optional additions.Of course my thinking on this is undoubtedly flawed but it's what I would like. Those of us who would like more options can have them, while those of us who don't simply elect not to add them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lakesidefantasy, post: 8453107, member: 6682043"] I would like a few base classes (fighter, rogue, wizard) with more restricted subclasses as an option. Meaning, I could play a basic fighter and build it any way I choose, or I could play a fighter-paladin with many of the build choices made for me. On top of all of that I would like optional archetypes that further divide each class and subclass into specialized things like fighter-paladin-oath of vengeance. I want options. Paradoxically I want the option to have less options, similar to the way feats and multiclassing are handled. Currently feats and multiclassing are optional [B]additions [/B]to the game. I would like subclasses and archetypes to be optional additions. Of course my thinking on this is undoubtedly flawed but it's what I would like. Those of us who would like more options can have them, while those of us who don't simply elect not to [B]add [/B]them. [/QUOTE]

Verification