Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What kinds of New Settings do you want?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Madmage" data-source="post: 5894127" data-attributes="member: 6693380"><p>As much as I'd like to critisize the Games Workshop business model, I think they have done one thing right in that they have 2 annually supported game lines (WHFB & WH40K) and generally rotate a 3rd game (blood bowl, necromunda, space hulk, etc) in support for long time fans and to introduce new players into a game where material isn't profitable enough for long term support. With the tremendous amount of backlog settings, I think a similar model might work for WOTC too. Were I given the reins of the brand the "big 2" would have to be 1 High Fantasy (Forgotten Realms) and 1 high adventure setting (Dragonlance or a new setting). While they might seem to be fairly similar on the surface, there is a distinction. </p><p></p><p></p><p>FR is such a vast world that other than on a Divine cataclysm scale (Time of Troubles & the lame Spellplague), even "Realms Shattering Events" don't have an enormous impact on the world beyond their immediate actions. Characters defeating the "big bad" of the Dalelands doesn't mean much to people in Amn and vice-versa. Magic abounds, elements of high fantasy exist in surplus, and it's a rich and vibrant setting that would be a huge waste to piss on... as much as I'd argue it was already done with 4E but there's a great core and a proven market for it.</p><p></p><p>I took Dragonlance as the example of high adventure to highlight as a setting where the metaplot is centered around a group of heroes and their actions. How this plays out on the table, is you center the player characters as being those heroes and your setting books are basically highly detailed adventure modules that bleed into each other. </p><p></p><p>Even if Dragonlance wasnt the setting of choice but a new creation, it might look something like this. Let's take the colonial game example a few posters described in this thread: The "old world" has been embroiled in centuries of warfare having depleted much of its (magical) resources, as the upper hierarchy has polarized into a very rigid status quo. It's just not possible for people to rise up through the ranks of society. Play up the oppressive natures of these realms where despair or malaise comes from the fact everyone has one time or another been affected by the constant struggles, war has ravaged and plundered the land, and what few great resources left are in the hands of a select few that use it as a method to keep themselves in power. Lo and behold, the PCs are hired in what might be the standard fetch quest and it turns out they find clues or hints of another continent. This first adventure should really hammer the dark feel of the original continent and how difficult life is there and try to nudge the players to want to leave for brighter horizons. Future books are based on players setting out on the voyage, landing on the new continent, setting a beachhead, etc. The books themselves detail these new areas but has an overarching storyline based on how the old world powers view this new development but also a sinister secret on why this continent was forgotten about so long ago, or what have you. It puts a firm emphasis on the actions of the PCs being integral or central to the metaplot.</p><p></p><p>The first campaign book gives you the mechanics portion of the setting with a general overview of the various old world nations, a fully fleshed out starting quest hub, and the main story adventure along with minor adventure hooks, npc descriptions and detailed descriptions to assist DMs with setting the tone or giving enough for players to go off the beaten path and not leave the DM scrambling. </p><p></p><p>The third rotating setting would follow the 4E model of releasing 2-3 books in a single year for a campaign. Here they can feel free to insert Birthright, Dark Sun, Ravenloft, etc and exploit their backlog just by compiling setting information, (re)-introducing mechanics that were part of those worlds, and maybe throw old time players a bone with some new fluff too. So essentially 1 big campaign setting book, a player's guide, and an adventure and away you go.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Madmage, post: 5894127, member: 6693380"] As much as I'd like to critisize the Games Workshop business model, I think they have done one thing right in that they have 2 annually supported game lines (WHFB & WH40K) and generally rotate a 3rd game (blood bowl, necromunda, space hulk, etc) in support for long time fans and to introduce new players into a game where material isn't profitable enough for long term support. With the tremendous amount of backlog settings, I think a similar model might work for WOTC too. Were I given the reins of the brand the "big 2" would have to be 1 High Fantasy (Forgotten Realms) and 1 high adventure setting (Dragonlance or a new setting). While they might seem to be fairly similar on the surface, there is a distinction. FR is such a vast world that other than on a Divine cataclysm scale (Time of Troubles & the lame Spellplague), even "Realms Shattering Events" don't have an enormous impact on the world beyond their immediate actions. Characters defeating the "big bad" of the Dalelands doesn't mean much to people in Amn and vice-versa. Magic abounds, elements of high fantasy exist in surplus, and it's a rich and vibrant setting that would be a huge waste to piss on... as much as I'd argue it was already done with 4E but there's a great core and a proven market for it. I took Dragonlance as the example of high adventure to highlight as a setting where the metaplot is centered around a group of heroes and their actions. How this plays out on the table, is you center the player characters as being those heroes and your setting books are basically highly detailed adventure modules that bleed into each other. Even if Dragonlance wasnt the setting of choice but a new creation, it might look something like this. Let's take the colonial game example a few posters described in this thread: The "old world" has been embroiled in centuries of warfare having depleted much of its (magical) resources, as the upper hierarchy has polarized into a very rigid status quo. It's just not possible for people to rise up through the ranks of society. Play up the oppressive natures of these realms where despair or malaise comes from the fact everyone has one time or another been affected by the constant struggles, war has ravaged and plundered the land, and what few great resources left are in the hands of a select few that use it as a method to keep themselves in power. Lo and behold, the PCs are hired in what might be the standard fetch quest and it turns out they find clues or hints of another continent. This first adventure should really hammer the dark feel of the original continent and how difficult life is there and try to nudge the players to want to leave for brighter horizons. Future books are based on players setting out on the voyage, landing on the new continent, setting a beachhead, etc. The books themselves detail these new areas but has an overarching storyline based on how the old world powers view this new development but also a sinister secret on why this continent was forgotten about so long ago, or what have you. It puts a firm emphasis on the actions of the PCs being integral or central to the metaplot. The first campaign book gives you the mechanics portion of the setting with a general overview of the various old world nations, a fully fleshed out starting quest hub, and the main story adventure along with minor adventure hooks, npc descriptions and detailed descriptions to assist DMs with setting the tone or giving enough for players to go off the beaten path and not leave the DM scrambling. The third rotating setting would follow the 4E model of releasing 2-3 books in a single year for a campaign. Here they can feel free to insert Birthright, Dark Sun, Ravenloft, etc and exploit their backlog just by compiling setting information, (re)-introducing mechanics that were part of those worlds, and maybe throw old time players a bone with some new fluff too. So essentially 1 big campaign setting book, a player's guide, and an adventure and away you go. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What kinds of New Settings do you want?
Top