Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8007213" data-attributes="member: 6987520">You can continue to dream all you want. There is a reason nearly 50% of the people have voted for wizard despite your tactics for sorcerer. I am guessing you voted for sorcerer... so at least you aren't alone... you got one other vote LOL.And again, you fail to realize the radiant damage from radiant soul is MAGIC. It won't work inside the Antimagic Field as it is a magical effect.Sorcerer's can't cast Antimagic Field or Invulnerability. A single Wizard can have both prepared. Wizards have many long range spells and with Invulnerability concentration checks auto-succeed, so for 100 rounds the Wizard is immune to all damage. With both INT and WIS saves, few non-physical spells will affect him as well if you go that route (there are options of course, but your Sorcerer has to be one build designed to have a good chance against ANY foe, so you can't tailor make it to just deal with Wizards).But, to clarify, as I have said from the outset, when it comes down to caster vs. caster; rolls, spell selection, and tactics all play a part. It is just Wizards have the edge. There is no &quot;hand down&quot; victor when it comes to caster vs. caster. The Cleric's Divine Intervention, for instance, could be very problematical, but that relies heavily on the DM's discretion as to what form the intervention takes, etc.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8007213, member: 6987520"] You can continue to dream all you want. There is a reason nearly 50% of the people have voted for wizard despite your tactics for sorcerer. I am guessing you voted for sorcerer... so at least you aren't alone... you got one other vote LOL. And again, you fail to realize the radiant damage from radiant soul is MAGIC. It won't work inside the Antimagic Field as it is a magical effect. Sorcerer's can't cast Antimagic Field [I]or[/I] Invulnerability. A single Wizard can have [I]both[/I] prepared. Wizards have many long range spells and with Invulnerability concentration checks auto-succeed, so for 100 rounds the Wizard is immune to [I]all[/I] damage. With both INT and WIS saves, few non-physical spells will affect him as well if you go that route (there are options of course, but your Sorcerer has to be [I]one[/I] build designed to have a good chance against ANY foe, so you can't tailor make it to just deal with Wizards). But, to clarify, as I have said from the outset, when it comes down to caster vs. caster; rolls, spell selection, and tactics all play a part. It is just Wizards have the edge. There is no "hand down" victor when it comes to caster vs. caster. The Cleric's Divine Intervention, for instance, could be very problematical, but that relies heavily on the DM's discretion as to what form the intervention takes, etc. [/QUOTE]

Verification