Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What level's this spell?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 7561317" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>Writing first before reading so I give you an straight idea, but since people probably have thought about something I missed this probably isn't complete unless you think about everyone's response.</p><p></p><p>Well, dang. 60' radius is quite big, so the variation on this is hard to tell. Same with the damage - a melee weapon attack can have a lot of riders on it. Now, the fact that it's self-only has some limits, and you can't be a raging barbarian using reckless attack. But you likely have a decent melee weapon attack to know/prepare this spell, so thinking of something like a fighter (samurai) in your advantage-to-all-attacks is not out of the question. </p><p></p><p>With say a flaming weapon that adds and extra 2d6 damage to every attack. Or someone with the shadowblade spell doing 2d8, 3d8, 4d8 damage each attack (with possible advantage) depending on how far they upcast it. That's almost likely as good spells to have together. Holy Weapon and various other things will improve every weapon strike.</p><p></p><p>There are also times that can do other things, but I'm not finding good examples. Can't find a "prone every attack", fighter (cavalier) can mark everyone but there's no effect if they don't end up within 5'. Vampiric Touch is a melee Spell attack so it can't be used. Okay, let me not borrow trouble.</p><p></p><p>So, do I look at this from a maximal targets & maximal damage perspective, which will be correct when "properly abused", or for a more conservative look? Well, I don't think the spell will be picked to be cast when it would have below average returns, so I will look at it with this is the right spell to use a slot on - good amounts of targets and good damage.</p><p></p><p>So let's say a chance to hit about the same as a non-trained save. Magical (assumed) P/B/S is actually fairly little resisted (thanks to a great ENworld chart where they worked out all of the resistances). So the damage is a little more valuable.</p><p></p><p>Conjure Volley is a 5th level spell with only a 40' radius, but it does non-magical 8d8 (36 average) P/B/S vs. a Dex save for half. This is half again the radius, which is a bit more than three times the volume. But unless you're looking at wiping out an army of bugbears, there's usually an upper limit to the number of targets. This spell does somewhat less damage, and while a hit is more likely then a failed Dex save, a miss is 0 vs. half. From those we'd be looking more positives then negative, so estimating 1 level higher. But this is a selective AoE, Conjure Volley is everyone. Add another level for that. That makes 7th.</p><p></p><p>At 7th level, I think throwing in a double strength misty step for the ending teleport for free is just fine.</p><p></p><p>But ... it doesn't seem to pass the sanity check. Fire Storm, a somewhat selective 7th level damage spell, seems to be pretty much superior to it. From this I think my rough calculations of conjure volley, with a superior damage amount with save for half vs. 3x the volume and landing a hit easier then failing a dex save, and selective, might have been off. If we assume those are even, give +1 for selective targeting we get to 6th. That seems more reasonable.</p><p></p><p>It's definitely a "many actions worth of effect" for a 11th level martial character condensed in one action.</p><p></p><p>As a side note, this spell screams out to me to be lower level and upcast to increase the radius.</p><p></p><p>You know, I wouldn't be as worried about that huge volume if we could eliminate the corner case of slicing down a huge chunk of an army or something. If there was a cap to the number of attacks, high enough you'd never hit it except in that corner case (as 12 or 15?) I'd feel better. </p><p></p><p>BTW, for all that I'm not sure I'd allow this spell at my table, but not for balance reasons. It's simply a lot of rolling. A single attack roll and damage roll might be too out of whack - a crit or 1 could vastly change the value to the spell, but even an abnormally high or low to hit roll would have an outsides effect positive or negative. Maybe a single damage roll. Not sure, but I'd definitely want to speed it up, since it's at it's slowest when it's most likely to be cast - when there are a lot of opponents nearby.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 7561317, member: 20564"] Writing first before reading so I give you an straight idea, but since people probably have thought about something I missed this probably isn't complete unless you think about everyone's response. Well, dang. 60' radius is quite big, so the variation on this is hard to tell. Same with the damage - a melee weapon attack can have a lot of riders on it. Now, the fact that it's self-only has some limits, and you can't be a raging barbarian using reckless attack. But you likely have a decent melee weapon attack to know/prepare this spell, so thinking of something like a fighter (samurai) in your advantage-to-all-attacks is not out of the question. With say a flaming weapon that adds and extra 2d6 damage to every attack. Or someone with the shadowblade spell doing 2d8, 3d8, 4d8 damage each attack (with possible advantage) depending on how far they upcast it. That's almost likely as good spells to have together. Holy Weapon and various other things will improve every weapon strike. There are also times that can do other things, but I'm not finding good examples. Can't find a "prone every attack", fighter (cavalier) can mark everyone but there's no effect if they don't end up within 5'. Vampiric Touch is a melee Spell attack so it can't be used. Okay, let me not borrow trouble. So, do I look at this from a maximal targets & maximal damage perspective, which will be correct when "properly abused", or for a more conservative look? Well, I don't think the spell will be picked to be cast when it would have below average returns, so I will look at it with this is the right spell to use a slot on - good amounts of targets and good damage. So let's say a chance to hit about the same as a non-trained save. Magical (assumed) P/B/S is actually fairly little resisted (thanks to a great ENworld chart where they worked out all of the resistances). So the damage is a little more valuable. Conjure Volley is a 5th level spell with only a 40' radius, but it does non-magical 8d8 (36 average) P/B/S vs. a Dex save for half. This is half again the radius, which is a bit more than three times the volume. But unless you're looking at wiping out an army of bugbears, there's usually an upper limit to the number of targets. This spell does somewhat less damage, and while a hit is more likely then a failed Dex save, a miss is 0 vs. half. From those we'd be looking more positives then negative, so estimating 1 level higher. But this is a selective AoE, Conjure Volley is everyone. Add another level for that. That makes 7th. At 7th level, I think throwing in a double strength misty step for the ending teleport for free is just fine. But ... it doesn't seem to pass the sanity check. Fire Storm, a somewhat selective 7th level damage spell, seems to be pretty much superior to it. From this I think my rough calculations of conjure volley, with a superior damage amount with save for half vs. 3x the volume and landing a hit easier then failing a dex save, and selective, might have been off. If we assume those are even, give +1 for selective targeting we get to 6th. That seems more reasonable. It's definitely a "many actions worth of effect" for a 11th level martial character condensed in one action. As a side note, this spell screams out to me to be lower level and upcast to increase the radius. You know, I wouldn't be as worried about that huge volume if we could eliminate the corner case of slicing down a huge chunk of an army or something. If there was a cap to the number of attacks, high enough you'd never hit it except in that corner case (as 12 or 15?) I'd feel better. BTW, for all that I'm not sure I'd allow this spell at my table, but not for balance reasons. It's simply a lot of rolling. A single attack roll and damage roll might be too out of whack - a crit or 1 could vastly change the value to the spell, but even an abnormally high or low to hit roll would have an outsides effect positive or negative. Maybe a single damage roll. Not sure, but I'd definitely want to speed it up, since it's at it's slowest when it's most likely to be cast - when there are a lot of opponents nearby. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What level's this spell?
Top