Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kenada" data-source="post: 9321607" data-attributes="member: 70468">Thanks for sharing this. I ended up staying up to listen to it all. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😂" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f602.png" title="Face with tears of joy&nbsp; &nbsp; :joy:" data-shortname=":joy:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />I was surprised to hear he ran 3e D&amp;D and didn’t seem to have anything bad to say about the experience, especially compared to what he discussed later about some PbtA and story game design problems he sees.The issue with those GNS essays seems to be the way people want to identify with the various goals of play. If his replies in the Youtube comments are any indication, he views that dimly. He does still believe in his model for analyzing play though. Personally, of the ideas from the Forge, I’ve found that more useful for working on my homebrew system than any stupid taxonomies (GNS, GDS, cultures of play, or whatever).I also liked his commentary on the Forge glossary, which is that you mostly don’t need it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="kenada, post: 9321607, member: 70468"] Thanks for sharing this. I ended up staying up to listen to it all. 😂 I was surprised to hear he ran 3e D&D and didn’t seem to have anything bad to say about the experience, especially compared to what he discussed later about some PbtA and story game design problems he sees. The issue with those GNS essays seems to be the way people want to identify with the various goals of play. If his replies in the Youtube comments are any indication, he views that dimly. He does still believe in his model for analyzing play though. Personally, of the ideas from the Forge, I’ve found that more useful for working on my homebrew system than any stupid taxonomies (GNS, GDS, cultures of play, or whatever). I also liked his commentary on the Forge glossary, which is that you mostly don’t need it. [/QUOTE]

Verification