Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7442289" data-attributes="member: 996">Yeah, it makes so much more sense when the fighter uses his one bonus ASI at 6th level for GWM/SS when he's behind on damage, for Actor when he's behind in the Social Pillar, or to shore up a low stat when he's suffering from bad saves, etc, etc, etc....Except for the people still saying it, of course.&nbsp; And, seriously, there are players/campaigns for which LFQW if still a feature, not a bug.&nbsp;Because class balance is optional.&nbsp; If, for some reason, you want class balance, and want to <s>play</s> run D&amp;D, anyway, you can opt into it.&nbsp; You choose a specific sub-set of the rules that you find least imbalanced or most susceptible to being balanced, run your campaign in 6-8 encounter/2-3 short rest 'days,' place a variety of challenges that puts each PC in the spotlight, in turn, place magic items and any other perks with an eye towards maintaining or re-establishing that balance, etc...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7442289, member: 996"] Yeah, it makes so much more sense when the fighter uses his one bonus ASI at 6th level for GWM/SS when he's behind on damage, for Actor when he's behind in the Social Pillar, or to shore up a low stat when he's suffering from bad saves, etc, etc, etc....Except for the people still saying it, of course. And, seriously, there are players/campaigns for which LFQW if still a feature, not a bug. Because class balance is optional. If, for some reason, you want class balance, and want to [s]play[/s] run D&D, anyway, you can opt into it. You choose a specific sub-set of the rules that you find least imbalanced or most susceptible to being balanced, run your campaign in 6-8 encounter/2-3 short rest 'days,' place a variety of challenges that puts each PC in the spotlight, in turn, place magic items and any other perks with an eye towards maintaining or re-establishing that balance, etc... [/QUOTE]

Verification