Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="karlindel" data-source="post: 5201409" data-attributes="member: 27103">I think a lot of the question depends on which categories a person likes.  It is rare that someone will consider something they like to be overexposed.I think the evil humanoid category is a bit too broad.  I think kobolds are might be overexposed (although I do love them), while orcs, goblins, and hobgoblins are fine.  If you consider lizardfolk and yuan-ti being underrepresented, you end up with the category overall being fine.  Personally, I am a big fan of humanoid opponents, although I would like to see more variety in lowe level adventures.Drow are overexposed.  Just the fact that they merit a category of their own next to groups as broad as Fey, Elementals, and Aberrations indicates this.  I voted that I think Demons, Devils, Drow, and Undead are overexposed.  I use demons and devils in many of my games, demons as agents of destruction and devils as tempters/masterminds.  That said, they are somewhat ubiquitous, and I would like to see more done with some of the other monsters.Undead are a ubiquitous enemy.  Although I generally enjoy them, I think that they come up much more often than many of the other categories.  Personally, I would like to see more dangerous natural creatures or monsters that appear more natural.</blockquote>