Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What monsters should be in a sequel to Tome of Horrors?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 750332" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>This is going to sound somewhat impertinent, but I disagree.</p><p></p><p>The advent of the d20 system has forced there to be levels of canonity. Whereas before it was everything WotC/TSR publishes is canon, and everything else isn't, the line has now been blurred somewhat. Now we have WotC products being the most canon (this includes official products from their designated fan-sites), other d20 publishers being canon, but less so (for the most part equally among them, by their very nature), and then just fan-produced materials. Where conflict occurs, the higher level of canonity trumps (if the conflict cannot be reconciled, that is).</p><p></p><p>All this, of course, is both a headache and a delightful challenge for people like me, who love to delve into the minute details and compare them. On the subject of the ToH though, it is most definately canon, the way I see it, since it was published by a d20 publisher (and one of the largest ones to boot), and especially because WotC looked the included monsters over somewhat, thereby implicitly adding a sort of approval stamp to them. Ergo, despite its origins as a fan-produced collective, it was designated canon by the powers that be.</p><p></p><p>...I am such a nerd aren't I? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Too true, but that merely falls back onto the levels of canonity I mentioned before. The demon lords are an excellent example of this. WotC's Orcus from the BoVD is thusly more canonical than the Orcus in the ToH. However, that is only true if there can't be a workable explanation for why the two Orcuses differ (and I'm going to endeavor to find such an explanation in a few months when I update "A Brief History of Orcus" for the Necromancer Games site).</p><p></p><p>In essence, the materials in the ToH are canon until something more canon comes along.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Gez, that isn't how it works. Anything WotC does is canon, then d20 companies, then fan-stuff (which isn't canon at all). Ergo, the MM2 leviathan is the most canon, moreso than the <em>Seas of Blood</em> one. We have to take the bad with the good. It's part of having a standard of officialness that applies equally everywhere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 750332, member: 8461"] This is going to sound somewhat impertinent, but I disagree. The advent of the d20 system has forced there to be levels of canonity. Whereas before it was everything WotC/TSR publishes is canon, and everything else isn't, the line has now been blurred somewhat. Now we have WotC products being the most canon (this includes official products from their designated fan-sites), other d20 publishers being canon, but less so (for the most part equally among them, by their very nature), and then just fan-produced materials. Where conflict occurs, the higher level of canonity trumps (if the conflict cannot be reconciled, that is). All this, of course, is both a headache and a delightful challenge for people like me, who love to delve into the minute details and compare them. On the subject of the ToH though, it is most definately canon, the way I see it, since it was published by a d20 publisher (and one of the largest ones to boot), and especially because WotC looked the included monsters over somewhat, thereby implicitly adding a sort of approval stamp to them. Ergo, despite its origins as a fan-produced collective, it was designated canon by the powers that be. ...I am such a nerd aren't I? :) Too true, but that merely falls back onto the levels of canonity I mentioned before. The demon lords are an excellent example of this. WotC's Orcus from the BoVD is thusly more canonical than the Orcus in the ToH. However, that is only true if there can't be a workable explanation for why the two Orcuses differ (and I'm going to endeavor to find such an explanation in a few months when I update "A Brief History of Orcus" for the Necromancer Games site). In essence, the materials in the ToH are canon until something more canon comes along. Gez, that isn't how it works. Anything WotC does is canon, then d20 companies, then fan-stuff (which isn't canon at all). Ergo, the MM2 leviathan is the most canon, moreso than the [I]Seas of Blood[/I] one. We have to take the bad with the good. It's part of having a standard of officialness that applies equally everywhere. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What monsters should be in a sequel to Tome of Horrors?
Top