Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What needs to be fixed in 5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5705799" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>For armor, I'd like to explore a concept of:</p><p></p><p>None: AC x+4, damage resist 0</p><p>Leather: AC x+3, damage resist 2</p><p>Chain: AC x+2, damage resist 3</p><p>Scale: AC x+1, damage resist 4</p><p>Plate: AC x, damage resist 5</p><p></p><p>The PCs in low or no armor dodge better, but get hit harder if they get hit.</p><p></p><p>Say that the D20 die roll required to hit None is 13 for a given foe and the die roll required to hit Plate is 9 and say the foe hits for 10 points of average damage.</p><p></p><p>Average damage becomes:</p><p></p><p>None: 4</p><p>Leather: 3.6</p><p>Chain: 3.5</p><p>Scale: 3.3</p><p>Plate: 3</p><p></p><p>So overall, the heavier armors protect slightly more. But, the PCs in heavier armor also get hit more often as well.</p><p></p><p>A higher level foe that hits easier +2 and harder +2 would result in average damage of:</p><p></p><p>None: 6</p><p>Leather: 5.5</p><p>Chain: 5.4</p><p>Scale: 5.2</p><p>Plate: 4.9</p><p></p><p>Combine this with Dex adding to AC, but not to hit for melee. Str is used to determine to hit for all melee classes.</p><p></p><p>The concept that any ability score can be used for to hit and damage in melee (and any ability score can be used to boost AC based on class) seems off to me. Just like Wis or Cha add to Will and Int does not, ability scores should be specific as to what they modify and this shouldn't change from class to class.</p><p></p><p>Magic armor could then add +1 to the resistance that the armor supplies and nothing to the AC. By definition, it would protect better and not just by random chance.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Another aspect of the game that this helps to alleviate is the swinginess. I've played (very high) AC defenders where the DM often rolled out of his butt. So, the defender got hit often not because he had more foes around him, but because the DM dice were hot. Lowering the chance to hit via AC doesn't necessarily equate to lowering the overall damage that the PC takes.</p><p></p><p>But, lowering the damage via resist automatically does, at least for any single attack.</p><p></p><p>In the first example above, a Defender in resist 5 Plate with 30 hit points has to get hit 6 times for 10 points of damage to go unconscious.</p><p></p><p>The Controller in resist 0 no armor with 25 hit points has to get hit 3 times.</p><p></p><p>This makes sense to me. The guy in armor is much harder to take out because the armor absorbs part of the blow each time. That's the reason armor was invented. Not to make a person harder to hit.</p><p></p><p>If a player wants to avoid the swinginess, he would move to a heavier armor. If the player wants to play the odds and hope to not get hit, he would move to a lighter armor. With the randomness of a D20 in the current game, heavier armor will typically help in the long run, but doesn't necessarily help at all in the short term.</p><p></p><p>It's great that you have armor on, but it's not helping in this encounter.</p><p></p><p>When I see Iron Wizards floating around who have high ACs and get hit on average the same as a guy in Plate and they don't really get taken out that much quicker if they are hit, just because they are smart, it doesn't make a lot of sense. Armor doesn't appear to protect that much. Adding Int to AC is purely a game balance rule. It really doesn't make sense that a low Dex high Int character is really going to be smart and experienced enough to dodge blows as well as a high Dex character.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Risk and Reward. Today except for Strikers, most PCs can do similar amounts of damage and can have similar levels of defenses. There is less of a concept of the lowly Wizard in the back that avoids direct combat because he is so frail, but he gets other significant advantages. Sure, he can slow a foe. Not that this helps that much.</p><p></p><p>Any more, that Wizard can have defenses as high as other PCs and the only main difference is that he often has fewer hit points (and part of that can be alleviated with Toughness and good Con or backgrounds). Wizards are these mighty warriors that can wade though combat just as much as the PCs in heavy armor, well protected by, err, their intellect.</p><p></p><p>Course, changing the armor this much is extremely not D&D-like.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Alternatively, having shields give damage resist instead of AC might be an option as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5705799, member: 2011"] For armor, I'd like to explore a concept of: None: AC x+4, damage resist 0 Leather: AC x+3, damage resist 2 Chain: AC x+2, damage resist 3 Scale: AC x+1, damage resist 4 Plate: AC x, damage resist 5 The PCs in low or no armor dodge better, but get hit harder if they get hit. Say that the D20 die roll required to hit None is 13 for a given foe and the die roll required to hit Plate is 9 and say the foe hits for 10 points of average damage. Average damage becomes: None: 4 Leather: 3.6 Chain: 3.5 Scale: 3.3 Plate: 3 So overall, the heavier armors protect slightly more. But, the PCs in heavier armor also get hit more often as well. A higher level foe that hits easier +2 and harder +2 would result in average damage of: None: 6 Leather: 5.5 Chain: 5.4 Scale: 5.2 Plate: 4.9 Combine this with Dex adding to AC, but not to hit for melee. Str is used to determine to hit for all melee classes. The concept that any ability score can be used for to hit and damage in melee (and any ability score can be used to boost AC based on class) seems off to me. Just like Wis or Cha add to Will and Int does not, ability scores should be specific as to what they modify and this shouldn't change from class to class. Magic armor could then add +1 to the resistance that the armor supplies and nothing to the AC. By definition, it would protect better and not just by random chance. Another aspect of the game that this helps to alleviate is the swinginess. I've played (very high) AC defenders where the DM often rolled out of his butt. So, the defender got hit often not because he had more foes around him, but because the DM dice were hot. Lowering the chance to hit via AC doesn't necessarily equate to lowering the overall damage that the PC takes. But, lowering the damage via resist automatically does, at least for any single attack. In the first example above, a Defender in resist 5 Plate with 30 hit points has to get hit 6 times for 10 points of damage to go unconscious. The Controller in resist 0 no armor with 25 hit points has to get hit 3 times. This makes sense to me. The guy in armor is much harder to take out because the armor absorbs part of the blow each time. That's the reason armor was invented. Not to make a person harder to hit. If a player wants to avoid the swinginess, he would move to a heavier armor. If the player wants to play the odds and hope to not get hit, he would move to a lighter armor. With the randomness of a D20 in the current game, heavier armor will typically help in the long run, but doesn't necessarily help at all in the short term. It's great that you have armor on, but it's not helping in this encounter. When I see Iron Wizards floating around who have high ACs and get hit on average the same as a guy in Plate and they don't really get taken out that much quicker if they are hit, just because they are smart, it doesn't make a lot of sense. Armor doesn't appear to protect that much. Adding Int to AC is purely a game balance rule. It really doesn't make sense that a low Dex high Int character is really going to be smart and experienced enough to dodge blows as well as a high Dex character. Risk and Reward. Today except for Strikers, most PCs can do similar amounts of damage and can have similar levels of defenses. There is less of a concept of the lowly Wizard in the back that avoids direct combat because he is so frail, but he gets other significant advantages. Sure, he can slow a foe. Not that this helps that much. Any more, that Wizard can have defenses as high as other PCs and the only main difference is that he often has fewer hit points (and part of that can be alleviated with Toughness and good Con or backgrounds). Wizards are these mighty warriors that can wade though combat just as much as the PCs in heavy armor, well protected by, err, their intellect. Course, changing the armor this much is extremely not D&D-like. Alternatively, having shields give damage resist instead of AC might be an option as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What needs to be fixed in 5E?
Top