Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What needs to be fixed in 5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nemesis Destiny" data-source="post: 5711128" data-attributes="member: 98255"><p>And I would not. This is an argument that's been had before, and there was no clear 'winner'. The community is pretty divided over this one.</p><p></p><p>I could get behind it if, and only if, the resources to buy those skills were completely siloed away from your other choices. Maybe training in these would come from your background (as would make sense).</p><p></p><p>I still find it generally unnecessary though. You want your character to be good at something? Fine call him trained if a skill check ever needs to be made. What? He was <em>really </em>good at it? Trained and Skill Focus (that you didn't have to pay for). Maybe only half-assed at something? Just +2 or +3 then.</p><p></p><p>10 foot poles made their glorious return in Mordenkainen's Emporium.</p><p></p><p>I found it a little jarring at first, but now that I'm used to it, I prefer it this way. I'm perfectly ok with not needing Dex <strong>and </strong>Con <strong>and </strong>Wis and possibly even Cha on my Wizards (forex). It's bad enough that they still have Fighters with a mandatory dependency on Wisdom as well as their other physical stats. I'm good with having them not be completely stupid, foolish, louts, (again forex) but some choice by build would have been nice (without having to pay a feat for it).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nemesis Destiny, post: 5711128, member: 98255"] And I would not. This is an argument that's been had before, and there was no clear 'winner'. The community is pretty divided over this one. I could get behind it if, and only if, the resources to buy those skills were completely siloed away from your other choices. Maybe training in these would come from your background (as would make sense). I still find it generally unnecessary though. You want your character to be good at something? Fine call him trained if a skill check ever needs to be made. What? He was [I]really [/I]good at it? Trained and Skill Focus (that you didn't have to pay for). Maybe only half-assed at something? Just +2 or +3 then. 10 foot poles made their glorious return in Mordenkainen's Emporium. I found it a little jarring at first, but now that I'm used to it, I prefer it this way. I'm perfectly ok with not needing Dex [B]and [/B]Con [B]and [/B]Wis and possibly even Cha on my Wizards (forex). It's bad enough that they still have Fighters with a mandatory dependency on Wisdom as well as their other physical stats. I'm good with having them not be completely stupid, foolish, louts, (again forex) but some choice by build would have been nice (without having to pay a feat for it). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What needs to be fixed in 5E?
Top