Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What new classes do you think we need?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xeviat" data-source="post: 7039411" data-attributes="member: 57494"><p>Hiya everyone. For a long time, I thought 5E had the most perfect set of classes for traditional D&D. The twelve base classes of 5E feel like they could cover pretty much all of the archetypes I can imagine. The archetype/subclass system makes it easy for them to branch out.</p><p></p><p>If the archetype system were expanded to allow reductive abilities as well, I think the twelve base classes could cover for even more classes. For instance, if the Fighter's Archetypes allowed for swapping out Extra Attack for other abilities (like how the UA Ranger was redesigned), the Fighter could cover the Warlord a lot better (give up Extra Attack for "grant attack" for instance).</p><p></p><p>The Psion always stood out as a needed 13th class. Despite my recent theorizing thread, the existing Sorcerer couldn't really cover for the psion. And now the UA Artificer has me nodding in acceptance to it being a different class (especially because they rolled engineer and alchemist together under it).</p><p></p><p>With all that said, what archetypes can you think of that you feel are deserving of their own classes. Do you think a fantasy Samurai would need its own class that a fighter subclass couldn't cover? Do you think the Sorcerer has base abilities that wouldn't lend themselves to an Elementalist? Is the Pyschich Warrior, Ardent, Soul Knife, Wilder, or Battlemind so different from the Psion that they couldn't be housed under the Mystic together? Do you want a shadowy Assassin, or do you hold onto hope for a true Warlord?</p><p></p><p>Here's my offering:</p><p></p><p>I think a true Summoner or a Shapechanger could be deserving of their own class in the right setting. Sure, a Summoner could be handed by the Wizard, a new subclass, and plenty of new summoning spells, but they'd have to ban other spells for it to feel right (unless "I summoned fire" flies with you). The same could be said for a shapechanger being a wizard with new spells, but again, banning all other magic would feel odd.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xeviat, post: 7039411, member: 57494"] Hiya everyone. For a long time, I thought 5E had the most perfect set of classes for traditional D&D. The twelve base classes of 5E feel like they could cover pretty much all of the archetypes I can imagine. The archetype/subclass system makes it easy for them to branch out. If the archetype system were expanded to allow reductive abilities as well, I think the twelve base classes could cover for even more classes. For instance, if the Fighter's Archetypes allowed for swapping out Extra Attack for other abilities (like how the UA Ranger was redesigned), the Fighter could cover the Warlord a lot better (give up Extra Attack for "grant attack" for instance). The Psion always stood out as a needed 13th class. Despite my recent theorizing thread, the existing Sorcerer couldn't really cover for the psion. And now the UA Artificer has me nodding in acceptance to it being a different class (especially because they rolled engineer and alchemist together under it). With all that said, what archetypes can you think of that you feel are deserving of their own classes. Do you think a fantasy Samurai would need its own class that a fighter subclass couldn't cover? Do you think the Sorcerer has base abilities that wouldn't lend themselves to an Elementalist? Is the Pyschich Warrior, Ardent, Soul Knife, Wilder, or Battlemind so different from the Psion that they couldn't be housed under the Mystic together? Do you want a shadowy Assassin, or do you hold onto hope for a true Warlord? Here's my offering: I think a true Summoner or a Shapechanger could be deserving of their own class in the right setting. Sure, a Summoner could be handed by the Wizard, a new subclass, and plenty of new summoning spells, but they'd have to ban other spells for it to feel right (unless "I summoned fire" flies with you). The same could be said for a shapechanger being a wizard with new spells, but again, banning all other magic would feel odd. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What new classes do you think we need?
Top