Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What new jargon do you want to replace "Race"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 8867928" data-attributes="member: 58172"><p>Judging by <a href="https://www.quora.com/What-were-the-heights-of-all-the-dwarves-in-The-Hobbit-films?share=1" target="_blank">fans</a>, the Tolkien Hobbit actors seem to be between 4'5 and 4'11. But Tolkien describes the Hobbit as between 2' and 4'.</p><p></p><p>For D&D purposes, a Halfling can easily be both "Small" and "Medium (Lightweight)", conceptually.</p><p></p><p>So, the player can choose whether they want a Small or Medium Size Halfling, depending on the abilities that they want to assign. If the hardier Halflings tend to be the ones who who venture, that is probably fine. And if a character is truly massive, then there might be an atavistic expression from certain obscure ancestors who were Dwarf or Human or so.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, use the Size catagories as vague ballparks, and let the player decide what the Size means exactly for ones own character.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Here is an other version of the SIZE PREREQUISITE table. Same idea, but more ballpark and less granularity. It is more straightforward. It gives more wiggle room for players who want a Small character.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>If both STR and CON are at least: your Size is</strong></p><p><strong>1:</strong> Tiny</p><p><strong>6:</strong> Small</p><p><strong>11:</strong> Medium</p><p><strong>16:</strong> Large</p><p><strong>21:</strong> Huge</p><p><strong>26:</strong> Gargantuan</p><p></p><p>Note, a Tiny Pixie is not a normal player character option, and would unusually have either Str or Con be a score of 5 or lower − probably 5 Strength since players are loath to give up Constitution. Typically, these Pixie characters would be poor at classes that require Strength (but who knows, perhaps some Dex build works well), but would be fully competent at caster classes, generally speaking, that can dump Strength.</p><p></p><p>Besides the extreme outlier of a Tiny character, the player generally decides the Size of the character by choosing the stats.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Generally, Size (Str-Con) ≈ muscle mass (ignoring obesity).</p><p></p><p>But I hate guess-timating weight during gameplay, and would never do it. However, I would keep muscle mass in mind when deciding the flavor for a particular character.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The OneD&D Players Handbook can, when referring to the Abilities, show pictures as examples of what Sizes can look like, with variations, some shorter and burlier and some taller and lankier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 8867928, member: 58172"] Judging by [URL='https://www.quora.com/What-were-the-heights-of-all-the-dwarves-in-The-Hobbit-films?share=1']fans[/URL], the Tolkien Hobbit actors seem to be between 4'5 and 4'11. But Tolkien describes the Hobbit as between 2' and 4'. For D&D purposes, a Halfling can easily be both "Small" and "Medium (Lightweight)", conceptually. So, the player can choose whether they want a Small or Medium Size Halfling, depending on the abilities that they want to assign. If the hardier Halflings tend to be the ones who who venture, that is probably fine. And if a character is truly massive, then there might be an atavistic expression from certain obscure ancestors who were Dwarf or Human or so. Meanwhile, use the Size catagories as vague ballparks, and let the player decide what the Size means exactly for ones own character. Here is an other version of the SIZE PREREQUISITE table. Same idea, but more ballpark and less granularity. It is more straightforward. It gives more wiggle room for players who want a Small character. [B]If both STR and CON are at least: your Size is 1:[/B] Tiny [B]6:[/B] Small [B]11:[/B] Medium [B]16:[/B] Large [B]21:[/B] Huge [B]26:[/B] Gargantuan Note, a Tiny Pixie is not a normal player character option, and would unusually have either Str or Con be a score of 5 or lower − probably 5 Strength since players are loath to give up Constitution. Typically, these Pixie characters would be poor at classes that require Strength (but who knows, perhaps some Dex build works well), but would be fully competent at caster classes, generally speaking, that can dump Strength. Besides the extreme outlier of a Tiny character, the player generally decides the Size of the character by choosing the stats. Generally, Size (Str-Con) ≈ muscle mass (ignoring obesity). But I hate guess-timating weight during gameplay, and would never do it. However, I would keep muscle mass in mind when deciding the flavor for a particular character. The OneD&D Players Handbook can, when referring to the Abilities, show pictures as examples of what Sizes can look like, with variations, some shorter and burlier and some taller and lankier. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What new jargon do you want to replace "Race"?
Top