Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What, no half-anarch or half-axiomatic template?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zappo" data-source="post: 1972698" data-attributes="member: 633"><p>Not really, but they <em>are </em>asexual. If we wanted to strictly look at Planescape, <em>Faces of Evil</em> explicitly says that baatezu have genders but cannot reproduce sexually; yugoloths can with other yugoloths; of the three big fiendish races, only tanar'ri can reproduce with mortals. Still looking at Planescape, nowhere it mentioned the possibility of other outsiders reproducing sexually with mortals, though it didn't deny it either and at least some celestials must be able to since we do have aasimars. Overall, 3E made the Outer Planes a <em>lot</em> more promiscuous. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Point... and even a modron could cast shapechange. Still, in their natural form they are definitely asexual. I reckon that, even in humanoid form, they wouldn't feel like having sex, or even understand it. While this explains the existance of half-axiomatic or half-anarchic creatures, I still think that they would be many orders of magnitude rarer than half-fiends and half-celestials.</p><p> </p><p> However, there's another example of the slant towards the moral axis: if a mortal has sex with a tanar'ri, they get a half-fiend. Why not a half-anarchic?</p><p> </p><p> I think the half-outside templates should be differentiated by the outsider's species. I can't see a half-devil having the same qualities as a half-demon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zappo, post: 1972698, member: 633"] Not really, but they [i]are [/i]asexual. If we wanted to strictly look at Planescape, [i]Faces of Evil[/i] explicitly says that baatezu have genders but cannot reproduce sexually; yugoloths can with other yugoloths; of the three big fiendish races, only tanar'ri can reproduce with mortals. Still looking at Planescape, nowhere it mentioned the possibility of other outsiders reproducing sexually with mortals, though it didn't deny it either and at least some celestials must be able to since we do have aasimars. Overall, 3E made the Outer Planes a [i]lot[/i] more promiscuous. :DPoint... and even a modron could cast shapechange. Still, in their natural form they are definitely asexual. I reckon that, even in humanoid form, they wouldn't feel like having sex, or even understand it. While this explains the existance of half-axiomatic or half-anarchic creatures, I still think that they would be many orders of magnitude rarer than half-fiends and half-celestials. However, there's another example of the slant towards the moral axis: if a mortal has sex with a tanar'ri, they get a half-fiend. Why not a half-anarchic? I think the half-outside templates should be differentiated by the outsider's species. I can't see a half-devil having the same qualities as a half-demon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What, no half-anarch or half-axiomatic template?
Top