Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 6510521" data-attributes="member: 5100">I rarely/never buy third-party stuff, even at the height of the SRD. I did buy the of the Role Aids stuff, back in the day, mostly the things that were Draconomicon or Libris Mortis type stuff, as fodder for my home brew. After 30 years of publications, I'm not sure whether that'd still interest me, but better odds than most.The biggest third party interest I have is in a resurrection of Dragon and Dungeon magazines, if WotC won't do it. Not sure if I'd be as interested w/o the brand names, but there are a few folks I'd give a shot. My main reason for wanting Dragon back in print is that the rules nuggets have to be pretty self-contained. I may pay more for less use, but what I do use doesn't have to be disentangled from a bunch of other stuff. It's also easier to include articles A, B, and F, than to say &quot;Warlock, but not Warmage from Complete Arcane, and these 8 feats are in but those 11 are out. Also only the new Wizard spells of 5th level and above are available.&quot;Dungeon I like because I just get it as a resource, whether I want to use it right then or not. When I look at a formal module, I consider whether it fits into my game right now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 6510521, member: 5100"] I rarely/never buy third-party stuff, even at the height of the SRD. I [U]did[/U] buy the of the Role Aids stuff, back in the day, mostly the things that were Draconomicon or Libris Mortis type stuff, as fodder for my home brew. After 30 years of publications, I'm not sure whether that'd still interest me, but better odds than most. The biggest third party interest I have is in a resurrection of Dragon and Dungeon magazines, if WotC won't do it. Not sure if I'd be as interested w/o the brand names, but there are a few folks I'd give a shot. My main reason for wanting Dragon back in print is that the rules nuggets have to be pretty self-contained. I may pay more for less use, but what I do use doesn't have to be disentangled from a bunch of other stuff. It's also easier to include articles A, B, and F, than to say "Warlock, but not Warmage from Complete Arcane, and these 8 feats are in but those 11 are out. Also only the new Wizard spells of 5th level and above are available." Dungeon I like because I just get it as a resource, whether I want to use it right then or not. When I look at a formal module, I consider whether it fits into my game right now. [/QUOTE]

Verification